Eleven additional higher level teaching hours, outcomes 3.2.7 to 3.2.12. This part assumes the SL core in Part A.
Guiding question: How does the classification of organic molecules help us to predict their properties?
Structure 3.2 · Stereoisomerism
1Stereoisomers 3.2.7 HL only Strong
The syllabus statement: Stereoisomers have the same constitution (atom identities, connectivities and bond multiplicities) but different spatial arrangements of atoms. Same atoms, same connections, different arrangement in space — which is what separates them from the structural isomers of Part A, where the connections themselves differ. This outcome appeared in all six sessions in the collection behind these notes, and carries more evidence than any other in Structure 3.
Structural isomers (Part A) differ in which atoms are joined to which. Stereoisomers have the same constitution — the same atoms, the same connections and the same bond multiplicities — but a different arrangement of those atoms in space. Two kinds are in the syllabus: cis–trans isomers, which arise from restricted rotation, and enantiomers (optical isomers), which arise from a chiral carbon atom. Stereoisomers cannot be interconverted without breaking bonds; they are different compounds, not different poses of one molecule.
Cis–trans isomerism
Rotation about a carbon–carbon single bond is free at room temperature, because the σ bond is symmetrical about the internuclear axis. Rotation about a C=C double bond is restricted: the π bond is formed by sideways overlap of p orbitals above and below the plane of the molecule, and twisting one carbon relative to the other would break that overlap (Structure 2.2). The groups attached to each carbon of a double bond are therefore locked in position.
If each carbon of the C=C carries two different groups, the molecule can exist in two forms. In the cis isomer the two like groups (or the two non-hydrogen groups) are on the same side of the double bond; in the trans isomer they are on opposite sides. But-2-ene, CH3CH=CHCH3, exists as cis-but-2-ene and trans-but-2-ene. But-1-ene, CH2=CHCH2CH3, does not show cis–trans isomerism, because C1 carries two identical hydrogen atoms: swapping them produces the same molecule.
A ring does the same job as a double bond. In cyclopropanes and cyclobutanes (the C3 and C4 cycloalkanes named in the syllabus) the ring prevents rotation, so two substituents on different ring carbons can lie on the same face of the ring (cis) or on opposite faces (trans): cis- and trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane are different compounds.
Cis and trans isomers are different substances with different physical properties. The polar C–Cl bonds of cis-1,2-dichloroethene reinforce each other, so the molecule is polar and boils at 60 °C; in the trans isomer they cancel, the molecule is non-polar and it boils at 48 °C. The trans isomer, being more symmetrical, often packs better into a solid and has the higher melting point. Their chemical properties can also differ when the two groups are close enough to interact: cis-butenedioic acid forms a cyclic anhydride on heating, but the trans isomer cannot because its carboxyl groups are too far apart.
(1) Is rotation restricted — is there a C=C, or a ring? (2) Does each of the two carbons carry two different groups? Only if both answers are yes are there cis and trans isomers. The E/Z naming system is not assessed.
Chirality and enantiomers
A carbon atom bonded to four different atoms or groups is a chiral carbon (a stereocentre, or asymmetric carbon). Its four groups sit at the corners of a tetrahedron, and they can be arranged in two ways that are mirror images of each other. The two arrangements cannot be superimposed, however they are rotated — in the same way that a left hand cannot be superimposed on a right hand. The two stereoisomers are called enantiomers. A molecule that is not superimposable on its mirror image is described as chiral.
Enantiomers have identical physical properties (melting point, boiling point, density, solubility, IR and NMR spectra) and identical chemical properties towards non-chiral reagents. They differ in two ways:
- Optical activity. Each enantiomer rotates the plane of plane-polarized light — by the same angle but in opposite directions. The rotation is measured with a polarimeter: light passes through a polarizing filter, then through the sample, and an analysing filter is turned until the light intensity is at its maximum again; the angle turned is the observed rotation.
- Behaviour in chiral environments. Enantiomers react differently with other chiral molecules, including enzymes and receptors in the body. This is why many drugs are made as a single enantiomer: one form may be active and the other inactive or harmful.
An equimolar mixture of two enantiomers is a racemic mixture (racemate). It is optically inactive, because the rotations produced by the two enantiomers cancel exactly.
Draw the chiral carbon with two bonds in the plane of the paper (plain lines at about 109°), one wedge (tapered, towards the viewer) and one dash (hashed, away from the viewer). Draw the second enantiomer as its reflection in a mirror line placed between them. Flat drawings with 90° angles do not show a tetrahedral arrangement and do not earn the stereochemical marks.
Is it chiral? — and can you superimpose the mirror image?
Pick a molecule: the model lists the four groups on each carbon, marks every chiral carbon and counts the stereoisomers (2n for n independent chiral centres). Then drag the 3D model on the left and try to make it match its mirror image on the right; swap two groups to see the enantiomer appear.
Drag the left-hand model to rotate it. The right-hand model is its fixed mirror image. The verdict reports whether the two currently superimpose.
| 2-bromobutane | C2: H, Br, CH3, C2H5 — chiral. One centre: 21 = 2 stereoisomers (a pair of enantiomers). |
| 3-bromopentane | C3: H, Br, C2H5, C2H5 — two identical ethyl groups: not chiral. |
| 2-bromo-3-chlorobutane, CH3CHBrCHClCH3 | C2 and C3 are both chiral: at most 22 = 4 stereoisomers. |
| A C4H7Cl that is chiral | 3-chlorobut-1-ene, CH2=CH–CHCl–CH3: C3 carries H, Cl, CH3 and CH=CH2. |
Exam focus · what the published papers show
Feedback on a question asking candidates to outline what is meant by a chiral carbon: surprisingly, this question proved to be more challenging than expected as many incorrect terms were used to describe the chiral carbon, as having four (or sometimes even 3), molecules or species. Less than 50% of students managed to describe a chiral carbon.
Four different atoms or groups. Not molecules — a molecule is the whole thing. Not species — that is vaguer still. Not simply “four bonds”, because every saturated carbon has four bonds. A published difficulty list records the same gap in three words: Chiral carbon definition.
Test each carbon in turn: list its four attachments and look for a repeat.
| Molecule | Attachments on the carbon in question | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| CH2ClBr | H, H, Cl, Br | Not chiral — two hydrogens |
| 2-chloropropane | H, Cl, CH3, CH3 | Not chiral — two methyls |
| 2-chlorobutane | H, Cl, CH3, C2H5 | Chiral — all four differ |
Feedback on the published version: Another poorly answered question with less than 35% of the students being able to identify which of the three molecules, could exist as enantiomers, with the rest not realising that the carbon in CH 2ClBr is not chiral. Two hydrogens are enough to rule it out — and they are easy to overlook because they are usually not drawn.
A multiple-choice item asks How many chiral centres are there in the following molecule? and a structured task asks you to Deduce the structure of a chloroalkene, C4H7Cl, that can exhibit optical isomerism, and identify the chiral carbon atom with an asterisk (*). [2] — its scheme awards one mark for correct isomer and a second for chiral C, with the note Accept any correct indication of chiral carbon.
Each independent chiral centre doubles the number of stereoisomers. One centre gives two; two centres give four. Feedback on a harder item: Only just over half the candidates deduced that there were two chiral centres in the given structure of ascorbic acid, so that there are 4 possible optical isomers. Many appear to have missed the one at the junction between the rings. Ring junctions are where centres hide. On another item the marking was all-or-nothing — The only possible chiral mark for an incorrect structure is 2 chloro butane. It tended to be 2 or 0.
A published task: Draw the optical isomers of substance X, showing the three-dimensional orientation of groups around the chiral centre. [2]. Its scheme carries two notes, and both cost marks:
| Award [1 max] for the two structural isomers showing correct bond angles if non-3-D (wedge-dash representation is omitted). | A flat drawing caps you at one of two. |
| Do not accept structures with bond angles of 90°. | A square cross scores nothing. |
The syllabus asks for this directly: wedge-dash type representations involving tapered bonds should be used for the representation of enantiomers. Feedback confirms the gap — Even when given the name of the stereoisomers many failed to get the mark as they do not have a good grasp of 3-D wedge-dash type representations. Two bonds in the plane, one wedge towards you, one dash away. Then draw the mirror image beside it.
A one-mark task asks: One of the structural isomers can exist as a pair of enantiomers. State the name of an instrument which can distinguish between the enantiomers. [1] The answer is a polarimeter, and it is reliably known — The vast majority of candidates correctly identified the polarimeter as the piece of equipment required to discriminate between enantiomers, and in an earlier session Over 80% of the candidates were aware that a polarimeter can be used to distinguish between enantiomers. Free marks, provided you can spell it. What is less reliable is the reason: one report records that many candidates confused optical isomerism with other types of isomers, so make sure the enantiomer pair you point at is genuinely a mirror-image pair and not a position isomer.
Attempt these before opening the solutions below. References give the session, level, paper and question number of the original examination.
Which molecule is chiral?
How many chiral carbon atoms are present in one molecule of (CH3)2CHCHClCHBrCH3?
Which compound rotates the plane of plane-polarized light?
Which compound exists as two configurational isomers?
The observed specific optical rotation, [α], of a compound is +7.00°. What is the specific optical rotation of a racemate of this compound?
Which statement is correct for a pair of enantiomers under the same conditions?
One structural isomer of C4H9Br is a chiral molecule. Draw the three-dimensional shape of each enantiomer of this isomer showing their spatial relationship to each other. [2]
(i) Draw the stereoisomers of butan-2-ol using wedge-dash type representations. [1]
(ii) Outline how two enantiomers can be distinguished using a polarimeter. [2]
2-Bromobutane can react with cyanide, CN−, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction. State an instrument that could be used to determine whether the product was a single enantiomer or a racemic mixture. [1]
Solutions and mark-scheme guidance · Set U
U1 A
C2 of 2-chlorobutane carries H, Cl, CH3 and C2H5: four different groups. In B, C2 has two Cl; in C, the carbon has two CH3; D has no carbon with four different groups.
U2 C
(CH3)2CH–: two identical methyls, not chiral. –CHCl–: H, Cl, CH(CH3)2, CHBrCH3 — chiral. –CHBr–: H, Br, CH3, CHCl… — chiral. Two.
U3 B
Only B (2-chlorobutane) has a chiral carbon; an optically active compound must be chiral (and not racemic). D carries two identical CH3 groups.
U4 D
Each carbon of the C=C in CHBr=CHBr carries two different groups (H and Br), so cis and trans isomers exist. A and B each have one carbon with two identical groups; C has no double bond.
U5 B
A racemate contains equal amounts of the two enantiomers, which rotate the plane by equal and opposite amounts: net rotation 0°.
U6 C
Enantiomers have identical physical properties except the direction of rotation of plane-polarized light (equal angles, opposite directions). Their chemical behaviour differs in chiral environments, and a racemic mixture is optically inactive.
U7 [2]
2-Bromobutane, CH3CHBrCH2CH3, drawn tetrahedrally with wedge and dash bonds: correct isomer ✔; mirror image shown clearly ✔. The chiral carbon carries H, Br, CH3 and C2H5.
U8 [3]
(i) Two tetrahedral structures of CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3, drawn as mirror images with wedges and dashes ✔.
(ii) Enantiomers rotate the plane of plane-polarized light ✔; by equal angles AND in opposite directions ✔ (“optical isomers” accepted for “enantiomers”).
U9 [1]
Polarimeter ✔. A single enantiomer rotates the plane of polarized light; a racemic mixture gives no net rotation.
Structure 3.2 · Spectroscopic identification
2Mass spectrometry of organic compounds 3.2.8 HL only Repeated
The syllabus statement: Mass spectrometry (MS) of organic compounds can cause fragmentation of molecules. The skill: deduce information about the structural features of a compound from specific MS fragmentation patterns, and include reference to the molecular ion. The fragment data are in the data booklet, so nothing here is memory work — it is reading.
In a mass spectrometer, vaporized molecules are bombarded with high-energy electrons. An electron is knocked out of a molecule, forming the molecular ion, M+:
M(g) + e− → M+(g) + 2e−
The molecular ion carries a great deal of excess energy, and many molecular ions break apart — fragment — before they reach the detector. Each fragmentation splits M+ into a positive ion and a neutral fragment (a radical or molecule):
M+ → X+ + Y•
Only charged species are accelerated, deflected and detected, so only X+ gives a peak; the neutral fragment Y is invisible and is identified from the difference between the m/z values. The spectrum plots relative abundance against mass-to-charge ratio, m/z; since almost all ions carry a single positive charge, m/z equals the mass of the ion.
- The molecular ion peak is the peak at the highest m/z (ignoring small isotope peaks): it gives the relative molecular mass.
- The tallest peak, the base peak, is the most abundant ion — usually a particularly stable fragment. It is not necessarily the molecular ion.
- Common losses and fragments help to reveal structure. Fragment data are in the data booklet; the masses below follow from atomic masses.
| Mass lost from M+ / fragment m/z | Fragment | Suggests |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | CH3 | a methyl group |
| 17 | OH | an alcohol or carboxylic acid |
| 29 | C2H5 or CHO | an ethyl group, or an aldehyde |
| 31 | CH3O | a methoxy group or CH2OH |
| 43 | C3H7 or CH3CO | a propyl group, or a methyl ketone |
| 45 | COOH | a carboxylic acid |
| Question | Propanal, CH3CH2CHO, and propanone, CH3COCH3, both show M+ at m/z 58. Which peaks distinguish them? |
| Propanone | Breaking a C–C bond next to the carbonyl gives CH3CO+, m/z 43 (58 − 15), usually the base peak. |
| Propanal | Breaking next to the carbonyl gives CHO+, m/z 29, and C2H5+, also m/z 29; loss of H gives m/z 57. |
| Conclusion | A strong peak at 43 indicates propanone; a strong peak at 29 indicates propanal. |
Exam focus · what the published papers show
A mass spectrometer detects ions — nothing uncharged reaches the detector. So every species you name is written with a positive charge, and the molecular ion, M+, is the whole molecule with one electron knocked off.
The molecular ion is the peak of highest m/z, because nothing has been lost from it. It is not defined by being the tallest peak — that is about which fragment is most stable, a different question entirely.
A compound with M = 60 gives peaks at m/z 60, 45, 43 and 15. Identify the fragments.
The published scheme awards [2 max] for any two of:
| m/z | Scheme wording | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | due to molecular ion/CH3COOH+ | nothing lost |
| 45 | due to COOH + / due to loss of CH3+ | the methyl broke off |
| 43 | due to CH3CO + / due to loss of OH+ | the hydroxyl broke off |
| 15 | due to CH3 + / due to loss of COOH + | the carboxyl broke off |
Check your work by adding. 15 + 45 = 60, and 43 + 17 = 60. A fragment and the piece lost with it always account for the whole molecule — which is both a check and, if you are stuck, a way to find the second fragment from the first.
The charge. Feedback: The majority of candidates addressed the peaks in the mass spectrum and tried to identify the fragments. CH3+ and COOH+ were the most popular fragments identified by candidates. Most candidates did not include the charge on the fragments and the examining team decided not to penalize the missing charges this session. Read the last four words. The tolerance is announced as belonging to that session, and a published difficulty list elsewhere names the requirement outright: Stating the formula of fragments and including charge.
The wrong half. Two reports describe naming the piece that broke off rather than the piece that produced the peak: the only confusion being when the lost fragment, i.e., CHO+ or C2H5+ was suggested instead, and mentioning +CHO, the broken fragment instead of +COOH, the actual peak for that fragment. The scheme above offers both phrasings — due to COOH+ or due to loss of CH3+ — so either is acceptable provided the arithmetic matches the peak you were asked about.
One item asks Which statements are correct about the molecular ion, M+, in a mass spectrum? Feedback: Another poorly answered question with only 46% of the candidates being able to identify which statements about the mass spectrometry of organic species were correct. A significant number seem to believe that the molecular ion is the most stable fragment formed. A published difficulty list carries Identifying the correct statements about the molecular ion in a mass spectrum. And the same confusion appears in structured form: Only a few candidates recognized the molecular ion to be responsible for the peak at m/z 74. Most candidates identified COOH to be responsible for the peak at m/z 74. Highest m/z, not tallest peak.
3Infrared spectroscopy 3.2.9 HL only Repeated
The syllabus statement: Infrared (IR) spectra can be used to identify the type of bond present in a molecule. The skill: interpret the functional group region of an IR spectrum, using a table of characteristic frequencies (wavenumber/cm–1), and include reference to the absorption of IR radiation by greenhouse gases. The table is in the data booklet.
Covalent bonds are not rigid: they vibrate, stretching and bending continuously. Each bond vibrates at a natural frequency that depends on the masses of the two atoms and the strength of the bond. When infrared radiation of exactly that frequency falls on the molecule, the bond absorbs it and vibrates with greater amplitude. Stronger bonds and lighter atoms vibrate at higher frequencies: C≡C absorbs at a higher wavenumber than C=C, which absorbs higher than C–C, and bonds to hydrogen (O–H, N–H, C–H) absorb at high wavenumbers.
A vibration absorbs infrared radiation only if it changes the dipole moment of the molecule. The stretching of the polar C=O bond changes the dipole strongly and gives an intense absorption; the symmetric stretch of CO2 produces no change in dipole and is IR-inactive, but its asymmetric stretch and its bending vibration are IR-active. Molecules such as N2 and O2, with no dipole in any vibration, do not absorb IR at all.
This connects infrared spectroscopy to the greenhouse effect. The Earth’s surface emits infrared radiation. Gases whose molecules absorb IR — water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide — absorb some of this radiation and re-emit it in all directions, including back towards the surface, warming the lower atmosphere. Nitrogen and oxygen, the main components of air, are not greenhouse gases because their vibrations do not change a dipole moment.
An IR spectrum plots transmittance (percentage of radiation transmitted) against wavenumber (1/λ, in cm−1, proportional to frequency), with wavenumber decreasing from left to right; absorptions appear as downward troughs. The region above about 1500 cm−1, the functional group region, contains the characteristic absorptions used for identification.
| Bond | Typical range / cm−1 | Appearance | Found in |
|---|---|---|---|
| O–H (alcohols) | about 3200–3600 | broad, strong | alcohols |
| O–H (carboxylic acids) | about 2500–3000 | very broad, overlapping C–H | carboxylic acids |
| N–H | about 3300–3500 | medium | amines, amides |
| C–H | about 2850–3090 | strong, sharp | almost all organic compounds |
| C≡C | about 2100–2260 | weak–medium | alkynes |
| C=O | about 1700–1750 | strong, sharp | aldehydes, ketones, acids, esters, amides |
| C=C | about 1620–1680 | medium | alkenes |
| Data | A compound C3H6O shows a strong, sharp absorption at 1715 cm−1, absorptions near 2900 cm−1, and no broad absorption above 3000 cm−1. |
| Deduction | 1715 cm−1: C=O present. No O–H band: not an alcohol or acid. Near 2900: C–H. |
| Conclusion | A carbonyl compound: propanal or propanone. IR alone cannot decide which — that needs 1H NMR or the mass spectrum. |
Exam focus · what the published papers show
IR identifies which bonds are present. A strong broad absorption around 2500–3000 cm−1 says carboxylic acid; a sharp one near 1700 says C=O; a broad one near 3300 says O–H in an alcohol. Look up the ranges; do not memorise them.
What IR does not give you is the carbon skeleton, the molar mass, or how many hydrogens there are. That is why it is nearly always paired with another technique — which is outcome 3.2.12.
Published tasks run three ways. Identify: Identify the bond responsible for the absorption labelled B in the IR spectrum. Use section 26 of the data booklet. Compare: State one similarity and one difference you would expect in the infrared (IR) spectra of two compounds — note the two-part demand, the same shape as the periodicity graph question in Structure 3.1. Distinguish: a task asks for the absorption that would be present in the IR spectra of alcohols and the carboxylic acids but absent from another class.
And one item asks about the technique itself: What is a disadvantage of using infrared (IR) spectroscopy as a technique? — IR tells you the bonds, not the whole structure.
State one similarity and one difference you would expect in the IR spectra of an alcohol and a carboxylic acid.
| Similarity | Both show an O–H absorption — both contain that bond. |
| Difference | Only the carboxylic acid shows a C=O absorption; the alcohol has no carbonyl group. |
Name a bond in each half of the answer. A similarity that says “both have peaks” and a difference that says “the spectra look different” earn nothing — the question is about bonds, and the data booklet supplies the ranges to justify each claim. Published difficulty lists carry both Comparing the infrared spectra of two compounds and Identifying the bond responsible for an absorption in an Infrared spectrum, while other reports are positive — interpretation of IR spectrum was very well done by most and Interpretation of IR and Mass Spectrum were mostly fine. This outcome rewards practice with the booklet open.
Attempt these before opening the solutions below. References give the session, level, paper and question number of the original examination.
What is always correct about the molecular ion, M+, in a mass spectrum of a compound?
Which technique involves breaking covalent bonds when carried out on an organic compound?
Which can be identified using infrared (IR) spectroscopy?
Which spectra would show the difference between propan-2-ol, CH3CH(OH)CH3, and propanal, CH3CH2CHO?
I. mass II. infrared III. 1H NMR
Combustion analysis of an unknown organic compound indicated that it contained only carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.
For the peaks at m/z 58 and m/z 43, deduce two features of this molecule that can be obtained from the mass spectrum.
Methanoic acid can be converted into methyl methanoate, HCOOCH3. State one similarity and one difference you would expect in the infrared (IR) spectra of methanoic acid and methyl methanoate in the region of 1500–3500 cm−1. Use the data booklet. [2]
Solutions and mark-scheme guidance · Set V
V1 B
M+ is the whole molecule minus one electron, so its m/z (charge 1+) equals the relative molecular mass. It is the highest m/z peak (ignoring isotope peaks), not the smallest, and it is often neither the most stable fragment nor the tallest peak.
V2 D
Electron bombardment in mass spectrometry breaks bonds to give fragments. IR only makes bonds vibrate; NMR changes nuclear spin states; X-ray crystallography diffracts X-rays.
V3 A
Each bond type absorbs IR at characteristic wavenumbers, so IR identifies bonds and hence functional groups.
V4 D
They are isomers (M = 60 for both), but their fragmentation patterns differ (MS); propan-2-ol shows a broad O–H band and propanal a C=O band (IR); and their proton environments differ (propan-2-ol three, propanal three with different shifts and splitting, including the aldehyde H near 9–10 ppm) (NMR).
V5 [3]
m/z 58: the molar / relative molecular mass is 58 (the molecular ion) ✔. m/z 43: loss of a methyl / CH3 fragment, OR a COCH3+ fragment ✔ (missing charges not penalized on that paper; C2H3O+ and C3H7+ also accepted).
(ii) Absorption A (just above 1700 cm−1): C=O ✔ (“carbonyl” accepted).
V6 [2]
Similarity: absorption at 1700–1750 cm−1 by C=O, OR at 2850–3090 cm−1 by C–H ✔. Difference: methanoic acid has the broad absorption at 2500–3000 cm−1 from the O–H of the carboxyl group, absent for methyl methanoate ✔. The scheme does not accept a bond without its wavenumber or a reference to absorption; does not accept C–O (outside the stated region); does not accept “hydroxide”; and does not accept 3200–3600 cm−1, which is the alcohol O–H range.
41H NMR: signals, chemical shifts and integration 3.2.10 HL only Strong
The syllabus statement: Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR) gives information on the different chemical environments of hydrogen atoms in a molecule. The skill: interpret 1H NMR spectra to deduce the structures of organic molecules from the number of signals, the chemical shifts, and the relative areas under signals (integration traces) — three separate pieces of information, and questions name which one they want.
The nucleus of a hydrogen atom, a proton, has a property called spin that makes it behave like a tiny magnet. In a strong external magnetic field its magnetic moment can align with the field (lower energy) or against it (higher energy). The small energy gap between the two states corresponds to radio-frequency radiation. In a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer, the sample is placed in a strong magnetic field and irradiated with radio waves; protons absorb (resonate) when the frequency matches their energy gap.
The exact frequency at which a proton resonates depends on its chemical environment. Electrons around a proton circulate in the applied field and create a small opposing field that shields the nucleus. A proton near an electronegative atom (O, halogen) or a C=O group has less electron density around it: it is deshielded and resonates at a higher chemical shift, δ.
Chemical shifts are measured in parts per million (ppm) relative to a reference compound, tetramethylsilane (TMS), Si(CH3)4, which is assigned δ = 0. TMS is chosen because all twelve of its protons are in the same environment, giving one strong signal; silicon is less electronegative than carbon, so its protons are highly shielded and appear upfield of almost all organic protons; and it is inert and volatile, so it does not react with the sample and is easily removed.
| Number of signals | The number of different hydrogen environments. Hydrogens related by symmetry are equivalent and give one signal. |
| Chemical shift, δ / ppm | The type of environment: what the hydrogens are attached to or near. Typical values: C–CH3 0.9–1.0; CH3–C=O about 2.0–2.5; H–C–O about 3.3–3.7 (ethers, alcohols) and 3.7–4.8 (esters); R–OH 1–6 (variable); R–CHO 9.4–10; R–COOH 9–13. Take exact ranges from the data booklet. |
| Integration trace | The relative area under each signal, proportional to the number of hydrogens in each environment. It gives a ratio, not an absolute number. |
| Propan-1-ol, CH3CH2CH2OH | 4 environments: CH3, CH2, CH2–O, OH. Ratio 3 : 2 : 2 : 1. |
| Propan-2-ol, (CH3)2CHOH | 3 environments: two equivalent CH3, CH, OH. Ratio 6 : 1 : 1. |
| Methyl ethanoate, CH3COOCH3 | 2 environments: CH3–C=O (about 2.0 ppm) and O–CH3 (about 3.7 ppm). Ratio 3 : 3 (= 1 : 1). |
| 1,4-dimethylbenzene | 2 environments: the six CH3 hydrogens and the four ring hydrogens. Ratio 6 : 4 = 3 : 2. |
Exam focus · what the published papers show
Deduce the features of a high-resolution 1H NMR spectrum of ethanol, including the number of signals, their expected chemical shifts, integration traces and the splitting patterns. [4]
Ethanol is CH3–CH2–OH. Three environments, so three signals. Work across them:
| Environment | Shift / ppm | Integration | Splitting, by n + 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH3 | 0.9−1.0 | 3 | 2 neighbours on the CH2 → triplet |
| CH2 | 3.3−3.7 | 2 | 3 neighbours on the CH3 → quartet |
| OH | 1.0−6.0 | 1 | no neighbours counted → singlet |
The scheme states the integration as 3 AND 2 AND 1 and accepts the splitting either way — Accept “3,4 and 1” for the splitting pattern, in any order. It also allows partial credit: Accept any three correct answers for a single signal for [1] each. So a candidate who gets one environment completely right still scores. Answer environment by environment rather than feature by feature, and a partial answer still earns something.
Feedback on an integration question: One of the most challenging questions on the paper - only 20% of the candidates gained the mark. Many candidates did not seem to know how to use the integration tract on the 1H NMR spectrum, others used the chemical shift values to obtain the answer which is not what the question required, and others stated the answer without a reason.
And on a similar one: About half the students realised that the 1:3 ratio of the integration signal from the two peaks could only arise from the ester. Many of the others did not read that the question asked for an answer in terms of the integration signal, or indeed did not give any reason for their choice. When a question names the feature, that feature is the answer. A published difficulty list carries Deducing the correct structure from an integration trace in an 1H NMR spectrum — the instruction is in the title.
Multiple-choice items match a spectrum to a molecule — Which oxygen-containing molecule has this low-resolution 1H NMR spectrum? — or a ratio to a molecule, one asking which has signals in the ratio 6:2:1:1 in its 1H NMR spectrum. Reports are middling: 63% of the candidates identified the given 1H NMR spectrum as that of propane, and 57% of the candidates identified the simplest ratio of the area under the signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of pentan-3-one. But one fact is weakly known in two separate sessions: Approximately 30% of candidates were able to identify the region of the e-m spectrum that is used in 1H NMR spectroscopy and Unfortunately very few candidates were aware that H-NMR uses radio waves. Radio waves — and one published item offers “infrared” as a distractor.
51H NMR: splitting patterns 3.2.11 HL only Repeated
The syllabus statement: Individual signals can be split into clusters of peaks. The skill: interpret 1H NMR spectra from splitting patterns showing singlets, doublets, triplets and quartets to deduce greater structural detail. Four patterns, and one rule.
In a high-resolution spectrum many signals appear as clusters of closely spaced peaks. The splitting (spin–spin coupling) arises because the tiny magnetic fields of protons on the adjacent carbon atom either add to or subtract from the applied field experienced by the protons being observed. With n equivalent neighbouring protons there are n + 1 possible combinations of their spins, so the signal is split into n + 1 peaks.
| H on adjacent carbon(s), n | Peaks, n + 1 | Name | Relative intensities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | singlet | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | doublet | 1 : 1 |
| 2 | 3 | triplet | 1 : 2 : 1 |
| 3 | 4 | quartet | 1 : 3 : 3 : 1 |
Three conventions apply. Equivalent protons do not split each other (the six protons of propanone give a singlet). The O–H proton of an alcohol usually appears as a singlet and does not split neighbouring signals, because it exchanges rapidly between molecules. And an ethyl group, CH3CH2–, attached to an atom with no hydrogens always shows the characteristic pair of a triplet (CH3, split by 2 H) and a quartet (CH2, split by 3 H).
Build a 1H NMR spectrum
Choose a molecule. The model groups its hydrogens into environments, places each signal at a typical chemical shift, splits it by the n + 1 rule with Pascal’s-triangle intensities, and draws the integration trace. Switch to low resolution to see what integration alone tells you.
Shifts are typical literature values for illustration; in an examination take the ranges from the data booklet. Splitting follows the simple n + 1 rule used in the syllabus.
| CH3–C=O | about 2.0 ppm; 3 H; neighbour is C=O (no H): singlet |
| O–CH2– | about 4.1 ppm (deshielded by the ester oxygen); 2 H; 3 H on the neighbouring CH3: quartet |
| –CH3 of ethyl | about 1.3 ppm; 3 H; 2 H on the neighbouring CH2: triplet |
| Summary | Three signals, ratio 3 : 2 : 3. |
Exam focus · what the published papers show
A signal is split into n + 1 peaks, where n is the number of hydrogens on the adjacent carbon.
| singlet | no neighbours | triplet | two neighbours |
| doublet | one neighbour | quartet | three neighbours |
Splitting reports on the atom next door, not on the atom producing the signal. That is what it adds: integration counts the hydrogens in an environment, shift says what they are attached to, and splitting says what is beside them. One published multiple-choice item asks exactly this — What information do we only get from the splitting pattern in an 1H NMR spectrum?
Propanone is CH3–CO–CH3. All six hydrogens are in the same environment, so there is one signal; and neither methyl has a hydrogen on the carbon next to it, because the carbon between them is a carbonyl. So the signal is a singlet.
Feedback on the published item: Only 50% were able to predict the correct combination of signals and splitting pattern of propanone, the second most chosen option being predicting a triplet as the splitting pattern. A triplet would need two neighbouring hydrogens, and propanone has none. Before naming a pattern, look at the atom on each side and count what is actually attached to it.
A scheme answering a splitting question gives doublet with the note Accept “2”., and the ethanol scheme accepts “3,4 and 1” for triplet, quartet and singlet. The count of peaks is as good as the name. One report is positive — there was a good performance in stating the significance of the splitting pattern in high-resolution 1H NMR — and a published task asks you to Predict the splitting pattern of the signal of the hydrogen atoms on the circled carbon, which is the rule applied to one environment only.
6Combining the techniques 3.2.12 HL only Repeated
The syllabus statement is one line: Data from different techniques are often combined in structural analysis. The skill: interpret a variety of data, including analytical spectra, to determine the structure of a molecule. There is no new chemistry here — only the habit of using everything you were given.
No single technique identifies an unknown compound on its own, because each answers a different question. Structure determination therefore combines evidence, and a good answer uses every piece of data provided and checks the proposed structure against all of it. Combustion analysis or percentage composition gives the empirical formula (Structure 1.4); mass spectrometry gives the relative molecular mass and so the molecular formula; the index of hydrogen deficiency is not required, but counting double bonds and rings from the formula helps; infrared shows the functional groups present; and 1H NMR reveals the carbon–hydrogen framework.
1. Mass spectrometry first. The molecular ion gives the molar mass, and with a percentage composition or an empirical formula it gives the molecular formula. Now you know what you are working with.
2. Then infrared. Which bonds are present narrows the class — a C=O rules out an alcohol, a broad O–H at low wavenumber says carboxylic acid.
3. Then NMR. Signals give the number of environments, integration gives the ratio, splitting gives the neighbours. By now there is usually only one structure left. Check it against every piece of data before you write it down — including the fragments in the mass spectrum, which will match the pieces of the structure you have just built.
| Data | A compound contains C, H and O only, with 62.0% C and 10.4% H by mass. Its mass spectrum has M+ at m/z 58 and a large peak at m/z 29. Its IR spectrum shows a strong absorption at 1730 cm−1 and none above 3000 cm−1 except C–H. Its 1H NMR spectrum has three signals: δ 9.8 (1H, triplet), δ 2.4 (2H, multiplet), δ 1.1 (3H, triplet). |
| Empirical formula | O = 100 − 62.0 − 10.4 = 27.6%. Moles: C 62.0/12.01 = 5.16; H 10.4/1.01 = 10.3; O 27.6/16.00 = 1.73. Ratio 2.98 : 5.95 : 1 → C3H6O, M = 58.1. |
| Molecular formula | M+ = 58, so the molecular formula is C3H6O. |
| IR | 1730 cm−1: C=O; no O–H. An aldehyde or ketone. |
| 1H NMR | δ 9.8: an aldehyde H — so propanal, not propanone (which would give one singlet). Ratio 1 : 2 : 3 matches CHO, CH2, CH3. The CH3 is a triplet (next to CH2). |
| Check MS | m/z 29 = CHO+ or C2H5+, both expected from CH3CH2–CHO. Propanal, CH3CH2CHO. |
Functional groups — identify the compound
Three instruments, one answer. Mass spectrometry gives you Mr and the pieces it breaks into, infrared tells you which bonds are present, and 1H NMR counts the hydrogen environments.
Mass spectrum. The peak at highest m/z is the molecular ion — that is your Mr.
Infrared. Absorptions are drawn downward, as an IR spectrum is conventionally printed.
Exam focus · what the published papers show
Predict the main features of IR and 1H NMR spectra of phosgene, COCl2. Use section 20 of the data booklet. [2]
Two marks, one for each technique, and the molecule is chosen to make a point.
| IR | A C=O absorption — look the range up in the booklet. The molecule also contains C–Cl bonds. |
| 1H NMR | No signals at all. Phosgene contains no hydrogen, so a proton NMR spectrum has nothing to show. |
That second answer is the whole lesson of this outcome. A technique tells you something only if the molecule has what it detects — and “nothing” is a legitimate, markable prediction. Check what a technique can see before you describe what it sees.
Feedback: Interpretation of MS was generally correct; some candidates considered propan-1-ol as an option, mainly guessing based on the Mr and loss of -OH fragment, thus not viewing all provided evidence. They read one spectrum, found a candidate structure that fitted it, and stopped. The other spectra were on the same page and would have eliminated it. Teacher feedback on a paper describes what these questions are for: questions showed a nice balance of content and integration, thus testing students' abilities to see connections between topics. One report also notices the legitimate reverse strategy — A few candidates were clearly working backwards after deducing the structural formula using the spectra given in later parts of the question. Reading ahead is allowed.
Attempt these before opening the solutions below. References give the session, level, paper and question number of the original examination.
What is the ratio of the areas of the signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of pentan-3-ol?
What is the ratio of areas under each signal in the 1H NMR spectrum of 2-methylbutane?
What information can be deduced from the splitting pattern of 1H NMR signals?
Which compound will have only one 1H NMR signal and show a carbonyl group in the IR spectrum?
This continues V5. Deduce the identity of the unknown compound using the previous information, the 1H NMR spectrum and the data booklet. [2]
(i) Deduce the number of signals and the ratio of areas under the signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of 2-bromobutane. [2]
Ethoxyethane (diethyl ether), CH3CH2OCH2CH3, can be used as a solvent. Deduce the number of signals and chemical shifts with splitting patterns in the 1H NMR spectrum of ethoxyethane. Use the data booklet. [3]
Justify why ethene has only a single signal in its 1H NMR spectrum. [1]
Solutions and mark-scheme guidance · Set W
W1 A
CH3CH2CH(OH)CH2CH3 is symmetrical: two equivalent CH3 (6 H), two equivalent CH2 (4 H), one CH (1 H), one OH (1 H).
W2 A
(CH3)2CHCH2CH3: two equivalent CH3 on C2 (6), the CH (1), the CH2 (2), the terminal CH3 (3).
W3 B
A signal is split into n + 1 peaks by n hydrogens on the adjacent atom(s). D is what integration gives.
W4 D
Propanone has C=O and six equivalent hydrogens. Ethanal and ethanoic acid have two environments; methoxymethane has one environment but no carbonyl.
W5 B
The signal near 9.7 ppm is an aldehyde H, ruling out C and the alcohols; four signals (CHO, CH2, CH2, CH3) with the upfield triplet and multiplets fit butanal.
W6 [2]
One signal indicates one hydrogen environment / a symmetrical structure, OR the shift near 2.2 ppm indicates H on a carbon next to a carbonyl ✔; compound: propanone, CH3COCH3 ✔. This is consistent with M = 58 and CH3CO+ at 43 from V5, and the C=O absorption.
W7 [4]
(i) Number of signals: 4 ✔; ratio of areas 3:1:2:3 (any order) ✔.
(ii) Circle A (CH3 next to CHBr): doublet ✔; circle B (CH3 next to CH2): triplet ✔.
W8 [3]
2 signals ✔; 0.9–1.0 ppm AND triplet ✔; 3.3–3.7 ppm AND quartet ✔ (any values within the ranges; [1] for two correct shifts or two correct splitting patterns only).
W9 [1]
All hydrogen atoms / protons are in the same chemical environment ✔ (“all H equivalent” and “symmetrical” accepted).
Review · Structure 3.2, additional higher level
7Misconceptions, the examiner’s view, and the question types
- “A chiral carbon has four different molecules (or species) attached.” It has four different atoms or groups.
- “Any C=C gives cis–trans isomers.” Each carbon of the C=C must carry two different groups.
- “Enantiomers have different boiling points / chemical properties.” Physical properties are identical except the direction of optical rotation; chemical behaviour differs only in chiral environments.
- “A racemic mixture rotates light twice as much.” Its rotation is zero.
- “The molecular ion is the tallest peak.” It is the highest-m/z peak; the tallest is the base peak.
- Writing fragments without a charge, or naming the fragment lost instead of the ion detected.
- “IR gives the molecular mass / number of hydrogens.” IR identifies bonds only.
- “NMR uses infrared (or UV) radiation.” It uses radio waves.
- “The integration trace gives the number of hydrogens.” It gives a ratio.
- “A signal is split by its own hydrogens.” It is split by the hydrogens on the adjacent carbon, n + 1.
Evidence base: the IB Diploma chemistry subject reports quoted in the exam-focus sections of this page.
Answered well: naming the polarimeter as the instrument that distinguishes enantiomers (over 80% in one session); stating the significance of splitting patterns; interpreting IR spectra and mass spectra in straightforward cases.
Found difficult: (1) defining a chiral carbon with the correct noun — fewer than half managed it in one session; (2) recognising that CH2ClBr is not chiral, and finding every chiral centre (ring junctions were missed); (3) three-dimensional wedge–dash drawings; (4) including the charge on fragments and naming the detected rather than the lost fragment; recognising that the molecular ion is not the most stable fragment; (5) comparing two IR spectra with one similarity and one difference; (6) using the integration trace when it was asked for, rather than the chemical shifts — one item was answered correctly by only a fifth of candidates; (7) predicting splitting for propanone (a triplet was often chosen for a singlet); (8) knowing that NMR uses radio waves; and (9) using all the spectra provided rather than stopping at the first plausible structure.
What successful answers did: listed the four groups on a carbon before deciding on chirality; drew tetrahedral wedge-and-dash structures with a mirror line; subtracted to identify fragments and wrote them as cations; quoted wavenumber ranges with the bond; answered each NMR feature in the terms the question named; and checked the final structure against every technique.
Six question types cover this whole document, and each has a fixed opening move.
| If the question asks… | …then |
|---|---|
| Is this molecule chiral? | List the four groups on the carbon and look for a repeat. Two hydrogens is the commonest one. |
| Draw the enantiomers | Wedge and dash, tetrahedral. A flat drawing caps you at one mark; 90° angles score nothing. |
| Identify this fragment | Subtract from the molecular ion. Write the charge. Say which fragment produced the peak, not which one left. |
| What does this IR absorption show? | Name a bond, using the booklet range. For a comparison, give one similarity and one difference. |
| Interpret this NMR | Signals = environments. Integration = ratio. Splitting = n + 1 from the neighbours. Use the feature the question names. |
| Determine the structure | Mass spec, then IR, then NMR — and check the answer against all of them before writing it. |
8Quick check
- Explain, in the words a scheme would accept, what makes a carbon chiral.
- Why is CH2ClBr not chiral?
- A molecule has two chiral centres. How many stereoisomers are possible?
- Why does but-1-ene show no cis-trans isomerism?
- A compound of M = 60 shows a peak at m/z 45. What was lost, and how do you write the fragment detected?
- Give the number of signals and the integration ratio for propanone, and name the splitting.
- Ethanol's CH2 signal is a quartet. What does that tell you, and about which atom?
- State one similarity and one difference in the IR spectra of an alcohol and a carboxylic acid.
- What would the 1H NMR spectrum of COCl2 show?
| 1 | It has four different atoms or groups attached to it. Not four molecules, not four species, and not merely four bonds. |
| 2 | Its central carbon carries two hydrogens — a repeated group, so the four attachments are not all different. |
| 3 | Four. Each independent chiral centre doubles the count: 22 = 4. |
| 4 | One of its doubly-bonded carbons carries two hydrogens. Swapping them changes nothing, so there is no second arrangement. |
| 5 | 60 − 45 = 15, so a CH3 was lost. The fragment detected is COOH+ — with the charge, because only ions are detected. |
| 6 | One signal, integration 1 (all six hydrogens equivalent), and it is a singlet — neither methyl has a hydrogen on the adjacent carbon. |
| 7 | Quartet = n + 1 = 4, so three hydrogens on the neighbouring carbon — that is the CH3. Splitting always reports on the atom next door. |
| 8 | Similarity: both show an O–H absorption. Difference: only the carboxylic acid shows a C=O absorption. |
| 9 | No signals. COCl2 contains no hydrogen atoms, so there is nothing for proton NMR to detect. |
9Summary and knowledge organiser
Essential knowledge
- Stereoisomers: same constitution, different spatial arrangement. Cis–trans needs restricted rotation (C=C or ring) and two different groups on each carbon.
- A chiral carbon has four different groups; its two mirror-image forms are enantiomers. They rotate plane-polarized light equally in opposite directions; a racemic mixture is optically inactive; they behave differently in chiral environments. Draw with wedges and dashes.
- MS: M+ (highest m/z) gives Mr; fragments X+ are detected; losses (15, 17, 29, 31, 45) reveal groups.
- IR: bonds absorb at characteristic wavenumbers if the vibration changes the dipole; C=O about 1700–1750, O–H acid 2500–3000 (broad), O–H alcohol 3200–3600; IR absorption by CO2, H2O and CH4 is the greenhouse effect.
- 1H NMR: number of signals = environments; δ relative to TMS = type of environment; integration = ratio; splitting n + 1 = neighbours.
- Combine: formula → MS → IR → NMR → check against all data.
Knowledge organiser
| Technique / idea | What it tells you | Must-remember distinctions and common errors |
|---|---|---|
| Cis–trans 3.2.7 | Groups same side (cis) / opposite sides (trans) of C=C or ring. | Both carbons need two different groups. E/Z not assessed. |
| Enantiomers 3.2.7 | Non-superimposable mirror images from a chiral C; polarimeter distinguishes them. | “Four different groups”, not molecules. Racemate: rotation 0°. |
| Mass spectrometry 3.2.8 | Mr from M+; structure from fragments. | Fragments are cations. Highest m/z ≠ tallest peak. |
| Infrared 3.2.9 | Bonds / functional groups present. | Quote the wavenumber range with the bond. Needs a change in dipole. |
| 1H NMR 3.2.10–3.2.11 | Environments, their type, their ratio and their neighbours. | Radio waves. TMS at 0. Integration is a ratio. n + 1 counts H on the adjacent C. |
| Combined 3.2.12 | A unique structure. | Use every spectrum; check the answer against all of them. |