Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701 · Topic 3, with 4.2 Bonding and structure
Chemical bonding
Everything in this page comes back to one idea: electrostatic attraction between positive nuclei and negative electrons. Ionic, covalent and metallic bonding are three ways of arranging that attraction, and every physical property that follows — melting point, hardness, conductivity, solubility, molecular shape — is a consequence of which arrangement you have and how strongly it holds.
What this page is
The whole of topic 3 and the lattice-structure half of topic 4.2, written out in full, with the 28 interactive animations embedded in the sections they belong to, plus 13 live simulations that compute their answers rather than showing a fixed picture. The animations run through Ruffle, a WebAssembly Flash emulator loaded from a CDN — everything else in this file works offline.
How to work through it
- Read a section, then run its animation. The animations are mostly activities — sorting, true/false, drag-and-drop — so they are worth doing rather than watching.
- Use the simulations to test a prediction you have already made. Predict the shape of SF4, then ask the VSEPR builder.
- The 3.4.1 tags are 9701 learning outcomes. IB students: the equivalent material sits in Structure 2.1–2.4, and differences are flagged in purple boxes.
- Press / to search the whole page.
Why atoms bond3.1–3.3
An isolated atom has a certain energy. If two atoms can arrange their electrons so that the system's total energy is lower than the two separate atoms, they will do so, and the energy difference is released. That lowered-energy arrangement is a chemical bond. Bonds do not form because atoms "want a full outer shell" — the full-shell rule is a useful bookkeeping shortcut that works because filled shells usually happen to be the low-energy arrangement for the first two rows of the periodic table. It fails often enough that you should hold it loosely: Fe3+, Cu2+, Pb2+, SF6 and PCl5 all exist.
Common trap
Students routinely over-apply noble gas structures. As the Cambridge support notes put it, there are far more ions that don't have noble gas structures than ions that do. Which ion actually forms is decided by energetics — the balance of ionisation energy, electron affinity and lattice energy — not by a rule about eight electrons.
Three ways to lower the energy
| Bond | Between | What happens to the outer electrons | Held together by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ionic | metal + non-metal | Transferred from metal to non-metal, giving separate ions | Attraction of oppositely charged ions in a giant lattice |
| Covalent | non-metal + non-metal | Shared as pairs between two nuclei | Attraction of both nuclei for the shared pair |
| Metallic | metal + metal | Delocalised over the whole lattice | Attraction of the cation lattice for the delocalised electrons |
Definition · what an examiner wants
Every bonding definition in this syllabus must contain the words electrostatic attraction and must say what is attracted to what. "Sharing electrons" on its own does not define a covalent bond; "the electrostatic attraction between two nuclei and the shared pair of electrons between them" does.
Ionic bonding3.2.1–3.2.2
Definition
Ionic (electrovalent) bonding is the electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions, formed by the complete transfer of one or more electrons from a metal atom to a non-metal atom.
Sodium has one electron outside a stable 2,8 core, and losing it costs relatively little (first ionisation energy 496 kJ mol−1). Chlorine is one electron short of 2,8,8 and gains one exothermically. Neither of those steps, on its own, releases enough energy to make the reaction worthwhile — the transfer Na(g) + Cl(g) → Na+(g) + Cl−(g) is actually endothermic by about +147 kJ mol−1. What pays for the whole process is the lattice energy: the enormous release of energy when those gaseous ions pack into a three-dimensional lattice, about −787 kJ mol−1 for NaCl.
How to think about it
An "ionic bond" is not a bond between one Na+ and one Cl−. In the crystal each Na+ attracts six Cl− ions equally, and each Cl− attracts six Na+. This is why "NaCl" is a formula unit, not a molecule, and why you should never draw a line between two ions in a dot-and-cross diagram.
Working out the charge on an ion
For s- and p-block elements the charge follows from the group: the atom loses or gains the smallest number of electrons that reaches the nearest noble gas configuration.
| Group | 1 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ion charge | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3− | 2− | 1− |
| Example | Na+ | Mg2+ | Al3+ | N3− | O2− | Cl− |
Exam alert · dot-and-cross for ionic compounds3.7
- Draw square brackets round each ion with the charge outside, top right.
- Show the transferred electron as the other symbol (a cross among dots) so the marker can see where it came from — but do not use different colours of ink.
- Read the question: "show outer electrons only" means outer electrons only; "complete dot-and-cross" means all shells.
- A negative ion's outer shell is normally full and drawn with 8 electrons; a positive ion of a Group 1 or 2 metal is usually drawn as an empty bracket, [Na]+.
- Never draw a bonding line between two ions.
Why ionic compounds behave as they do
Every property comes from "giant lattice of charged particles, each strongly attracted to several neighbours":
- High melting and boiling points — melting means separating ions against the full lattice attraction. NaCl melts at 801 °C, MgO at 2852 °C.
- Hard but brittle — hard because the lattice resists deformation; brittle because a small displacement of one layer brings like charges face to face and the crystal splits along the plane.
- Conduct only when molten or in solution — the ions carry the charge and must be free to move. A solid ionic crystal is an insulator.
- Often soluble in water — the ion–dipole attraction to polar water molecules (hydration) can repay the lattice energy. Non-polar solvents cannot, so ionic solids are insoluble in hexane.
Lattice energy depends on charge and size
Lattice energy is roughly proportional to (q+ × q−) / (r+ + r−). Doubling both charges quadruples the attraction; that is why MgO (2+/2−) melts more than 2000 °C above NaCl (1+/1−) despite having almost identical ionic radii and the same lattice type.
| Compound | Charges | Sum of ionic radii / pm | Lattice energy / kJ mol−1 | Melting point / °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl | 1+, 1− | 283 | −787 | 801 |
| NaF | 1+, 1− | 235 | −929 | 993 |
| MgO | 2+, 2− | 212 | −3791 | 2852 |
| CaO | 2+, 2− | 240 | −3401 | 2613 |
IB cross-reference
IB Structure 2.1 asks the same thing but adds a quantitative slant: you are expected to deduce formulae from ion charges and to explain lattice enthalpy trends from ionic radius and charge. The "electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions" wording is identical in both syllabuses.
Covalent bonding3.4.1(a)–(b)
Definition
A covalent bond is the electrostatic attraction between the two nuclei of the bonded atoms and the shared pair of electrons between them.
The shared pair sits in the region between the two nuclei, where it is attracted by both. That attraction pulls the nuclei together; nuclear–nuclear repulsion pushes them apart. The bond length is the separation at which those balance, and the depth of the energy well at that separation is the bond energy.
Single, double and triple bonds
| Shared pairs | Shown as | Examples | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (single) | one line, X–Y | H2, Cl2, HCl, CH4, NH3, H2O, C2H6 | One σ bond |
| 2 (double) | two lines, X=Y | O2, CO2, C2H4, SO2 | One σ + one π |
| 3 (triple) | three lines, X≡Y | N2, C2H2, HCN, CO | One σ + two π |
Expanded octets3.4.1(b)
Elements in Period 3 and below can accommodate more than eight electrons in their outer shell because d orbitals of similar energy are available. You are expected to know these:
| Molecule | Electrons round the central atom | Shape | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 | 10 (2 double bonds + 1 lone pair) | bent, ≈119° | Two S=O double bonds |
| SO3 | 12 | trigonal planar, 120° | Three S=O double bonds |
| PCl5 | 10 | trigonal bipyramidal | Exists as PCl4+PCl6− in the solid |
| SF6 | 12 | octahedral, 90° | Extremely inert; used as an insulating gas |
Exam alert · drawing in three dimensions
For SF6 and PCl5 you are expected to use the standard conventions: an ordinary line in the plane of the paper, a solid wedge for a bond coming towards you, and a dashed or hashed line for a bond going back. Marks are lost for flat, ambiguous diagrams.
Dative covalent (co-ordinate) bonding3.4.1(c)
Definition
A dative covalent (co-ordinate) bond is a covalent bond in which both electrons of the shared pair come from the same atom. It is shown by an arrow pointing from the donor atom to the acceptor.
The two requirements are a lone pair on the donor and a vacant orbital on the acceptor. Once formed, the bond is indistinguishable from any other covalent bond of the same type — all four N–H bonds in NH4+ have identical length and strength, and the ion is a perfect tetrahedron.
| Species | Donor (lone pair) | Acceptor (vacant orbital) | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+ | N of NH3 | H+ | The syllabus example; all four bonds become equivalent |
| H3O+ | O of H2O | H+ | What "H+(aq)" really is |
| Al2Cl6 | Cl of one AlCl3 | Al of the other | The syllabus dimer; two dative bonds, one each way |
| NH3·BF3 | N of NH3 | B of BF3 | Classic donor–acceptor adduct; B completes its octet |
| [Al(H2O)6]3+ | O of each water | Al3+ | Six dative bonds; met later with complex ions |
Metallic bonding3.3.1
Definition
Metallic bonding is the electrostatic attraction between a lattice of positive metal ions and the sea of delocalised electrons formed from their outer shells.
A metal atom cannot lower its energy by transferring electrons to another metal atom — neither is electronegative enough to hold them. Instead the outer-shell orbitals of every atom in the crystal overlap into one continuous set of orbitals spanning the whole piece of metal, and the outer electrons occupy those. Each electron is no longer associated with a particular nucleus; the ibchem page describes the result as marbles stuck into blu-tack, the cations being the marbles and the delocalised electrons the blu-tack holding them.
What makes metallic bonding strong?
Two factors, and both are about how much charge is packed into how small a space:
- Number of delocalised electrons per atom (equivalently, the charge on the cation). Sodium contributes one, magnesium two, aluminium three.
- Size of the cation. A smaller ion puts its charge closer to the electron sea, so the attraction is stronger.
| Group 1 metal | Ionic radius / pm | m.p. / °C |
|---|---|---|
| Li | 76 | 181 |
| Na | 102 | 98 |
| K | 138 | 63 |
| Rb | 152 | 39 |
| Cs | 167 | 29 |
| Period 3 metal | Ion charge | Radius / pm | m.p. / °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na | 1+ | 102 | 98 |
| Mg | 2+ | 72 | 650 |
| Al | 3+ | 54 | 660 |
Common trap
Metals conduct electricity because delocalised electrons move, not because ions move. Ions moving is how a molten ionic compound conducts. Saying "the ions carry the current in a metal" is a standard lost mark.
Properties explained
- Electrical conductivity — an applied potential difference makes the delocalised electrons drift; they enter at one end and leave at the other. The metal is unchanged chemically.
- Thermal conductivity — heat is carried both by lattice vibrations and, far more effectively, by the mobile electrons. Silver 430, copper 400, aluminium 235, brass 109 W m−1 K−1.
- Malleable and ductile — the bonding is non-directional, so one layer of cations can slide over another and the electron sea simply flows with it. Contrast the brittleness of an ionic lattice, where the same displacement brings like charges together.
- High melting point, high density, shiny — strong bonding, efficient close packing, and delocalised electrons that absorb and re-emit light across the visible range.
- Exceptions exist — mercury is liquid at room temperature and the Group 1 metals are soft enough to cut with a knife, because their metallic bonding is weak.
Comparing the three strong bonds
| Ionic | Covalent | Metallic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Particles | cations + anions | atoms | cations + delocalised e− |
| Attraction between | opposite ions | two nuclei and a shared pair | cations and the electron sea |
| Directional? | No | Yes | No |
| Typical m.p. | high | very high (giant) or very low (simple molecular) | usually high |
| Conducts as a solid? | No | No (graphite is the exception) | Yes |
| Conducts when molten? | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mechanical | hard, brittle | hard (giant); soft, weak (molecular) | malleable, ductile |
σ and π bonds, and hybridisation3.4.2
A covalent bond is an overlap of atomic orbitals. How they overlap divides bonds into two kinds.
Definitions
A σ (sigma) bond is formed by end-on overlap of orbitals along the line joining the two nuclei. The electron density is concentrated on that axis, and the bond is free to rotate.
A π (pi) bond is formed by sideways overlap of p orbitals above and below (or in front of and behind) the internuclear axis. It has a nodal plane through the nuclei, is weaker than a σ bond, and locks the molecule against rotation.
Hybridisation
Carbon's ground state is 1s22s22p2 — only two unpaired electrons, yet it forms four bonds. Promoting one 2s electron to the empty 2p orbital costs energy but is repaid four times over by the extra bonds. The 2s and 2p orbitals then mix into equivalent hybrid orbitals.
| Hybrid | Orbitals mixed | σ bonds from the C | Left over | Geometry | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sp3 | one s + three p | 4 | none | tetrahedral, 109.5° | CH4, C2H6, diamond |
| sp2 | one s + two p | 3 | one p, forms 1 π | trigonal planar, 120° | C2H4, benzene, graphite |
| sp | one s + one p | 2 | two p, form 2 π | linear, 180° | C2H2, HCN, CO2 |
The syllabus examples in detail
- H2 — plain 1s–1s overlap. No hybridisation is involved or needed.
- Ethane, C2H6 — each carbon sp3. Seven σ bonds (one C–C, six C–H) and no π bonds, so the C–C bond rotates freely.
- Ethene, C2H4 — each carbon sp2, with one unhybridised 2p orbital perpendicular to the molecular plane. Sideways overlap of those two p orbitals gives the π bond. Five σ + one π; the molecule is planar and cannot rotate about C=C, which is the origin of cis–trans isomerism.
- Ethyne, C2H2 — each carbon sp, two unhybridised p orbitals each, giving two mutually perpendicular π bonds. Three σ + two π; linear.
- HCN — the nitrogen (1s22s22px12py12pz1) is sp hybridised, giving two sp hybrids of which one holds the lone pair; the other forms the σ bond to carbon, and two p orbitals form the two π bonds of the triple bond.
- N2 — exactly the same orbital arrangement as ethyne and HCN, but with a lone pair at each end instead of a hydrogen. The N≡N bond energy of 944 kJ mol−1 is why nitrogen is so unreactive.
- Benzene — six sp2 carbons in a planar ring; the six unhybridised p orbitals overlap all the way round, giving a delocalised π system above and below the ring rather than three localised double bonds. Studied in full in the organic half of the course, but the orbital picture belongs here.
Exam alert · counting bonds
"How many σ and π bonds are in propene, CH3CH=CH2?" Count every line in the displayed formula: 8 lines total, of which one is the second line of the double bond. So 8 σ and 1 π. Rule: every bond contributes exactly one σ; each additional line is one π.
Bond energy and bond length3.4.3
Definitions
Bond energy (bond enthalpy, bond dissociation enthalpy) is the energy needed to break one mole of a covalent bond to give separated atoms, everything being in the gas state: X–Y(g) → X(g) + Y(g). It is always positive because breaking a bond absorbs energy. For HCl it is +432 kJ mol−1.
Bond length is the distance between the nuclei of two covalently bonded atoms.
Common trap · the gas-state condition
The "everything in the gas state" clause is not decoration. It is why you cannot feed bond energies straight into an enthalpy calculation for a reaction whose reactants or products are liquids or solids — you must include the enthalpy of vaporisation or sublimation first. This catches people out in the energetics unit.
The two trends, and why they run opposite ways
Larger atoms have more electron shells, so their nuclei end up further apart and the bond is longer. In a longer bond the shared pair is further from each nucleus and better shielded by the inner shells, so it is held less tightly — the bond is weaker. Shorter therefore usually means stronger.
| Bond | Length / nm | Energy / kJ mol−1 | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| C–F | 0.138 | 467 | Fluoroalkanes are so unreactive they are set aside |
| C–Cl | 0.177 | 346 | Reactivity of halogenoalkanes increases down the group because the C–X bond gets easier to break |
| C–Br | 0.193 | 290 | |
| C–I | 0.214 | 228 |
How to think about it
Two independent effects compete as you go down a group: more protons in the nucleus (pulling harder) versus more inner shells (shielding and pushing the pair further out). Shielding and distance win, which is the same reason electronegativity falls down a group. If you can state that once, you have explained bond energy trends, electronegativity trends and halogenoalkane reactivity with a single argument.
Multiple bonds are shorter and stronger
| Bond | Length / nm | Energy / kJ mol−1 |
|---|---|---|
| C–C | 0.154 | 350 |
| C=C | 0.134 | 610 |
| C≡C | 0.120 | 840 |
| N–N | 0.145 | 160 |
| N≡N | 0.110 | 944 |
Electronegativity3.1.1–3.1.3 · 3.6.2
Definition
Electronegativity is the ability of an atom to attract the pair of electrons in a covalent bond towards itself.
It is a property of an atom within a bond, not of an isolated atom — which is why it is measured on a relative scale rather than in joules. The usual scale is Pauling's, running from caesium at 0.79 to fluorine at 3.98, the most electronegative element.
| Element | H | Li | Be | B | C | N | O | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauling value | 2.20 | 0.98 | 1.57 | 2.04 | 2.55 | 3.04 | 3.44 | 3.98 |
| Element | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | Cl | Br | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauling value | 0.93 | 1.31 | 1.61 | 1.90 | 2.19 | 2.58 | 3.16 | 2.96 | 2.66 |
What electronegativity depends on
Two factors, and they are the same two that control atomic radius and ionisation energy:
- Nuclear charge — more protons pull the bonding pair harder.
- Distance and shielding — the further the bonding pair is from the nucleus, and the more inner shells lie between, the weaker the pull. The relevant quantity is the number of unshielded protons, i.e. the effective nuclear charge felt by the bonding pair.
Across a period (Na → Cl): electronegativity increases
Nuclear charge rises by one proton each step. The added electron goes into the same shell, so shielding is essentially unchanged and the atomic radius falls. Effective nuclear charge on a bonding pair rises sharply, so the pull increases.
Down a group (F → I): electronegativity decreases
Nuclear charge also rises, but each step adds a complete inner shell. The bonding pair is now much further from the nucleus and much more shielded, and those effects outweigh the extra protons.
Bond polarity, and bond type from Δχ3.1.4
If the two bonded atoms have equal electronegativity the shared pair sits centrally: the bond is pure (non-polar) covalent. If one atom pulls harder, the pair is displaced towards it, giving that atom a partial negative charge δ− and leaving the other δ+: a polar covalent bond with a permanent dipole. Push the difference far enough and the pair is transferred outright, which is an ionic bond.
How to think about it
Ionic and covalent are not two separate categories with a wall between them. They are the two ends of a continuous scale, and almost every real bond is somewhere in between. "Ionic with covalent character" and "covalent with ionic character" describe the same middle ground from opposite sides.
| Electronegativity difference Δχ | Bond regarded as |
|---|---|
| less than 0.5 | pure covalent |
| 0.5 to 1.6 | polar covalent |
| 1.6 to 2.0 | a metal is involved → ionic; only non-metals → polar covalent |
| greater than 2.0 | ionic |
Polarising power and polarisability3.1.4
Coming from the ionic side: a small, highly charged cation distorts the electron cloud of a large anion, dragging electron density back into the space between the ions. That is covalent character in an ionic compound. The cation's ability to do this is its polarising power (high for small, highly charged ions such as Al3+ and Be2+); the anion's susceptibility is its polarisability (high for large, highly charged ions such as I−).
This is why AlCl3 sublimes at 178 °C and dissolves in organic solvents, behaving as a covalent molecule, while NaCl is a classic high-melting ionic solid — despite both being "metal + chlorine".
IB cross-reference
IB Structure 2.2 uses a bonding triangle (the van Arkel–Ketelaar diagram), plotting average electronegativity against Δχ, to place a compound on a continuum between ionic, covalent and metallic. The chemistry is identical to the table above; only the presentation differs. The simulation above reports both.
Polar bonds vs polar molecules
A molecule has a net dipole only if its individual bond dipoles do not cancel. Because a dipole is a vector, cancellation depends entirely on the shape. So a molecule can be full of strongly polar bonds and still be completely non-polar.
| Molecule | Shape | Bonds polar? | Molecule polar? | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 | linear | yes, C=O | no | The two equal dipoles point exactly opposite and cancel |
| H2O | bent, 104.5° | yes, O–H | yes | The bent shape means they add to a net dipole through the O |
| CCl4 | tetrahedral | yes, C–Cl | no | Four identical dipoles arranged symmetrically cancel |
| CHCl3 | tetrahedral | yes | yes | The C–H bond breaks the symmetry |
| NH3 | trigonal pyramidal | yes, N–H | yes | Not symmetrical; the lone pair adds to the dipole |
| BF3 | trigonal planar | yes, and very | no | Three dipoles at 120° sum to zero |
| SO2 | bent, ≈119° | yes | yes | The lone pair on S bends it, so they cannot cancel |
Exam alert · the routine
- Work out the shape first (VSEPR — see Section 20).
- Mark δ+ and δ− on every bond.
- Ask: are all the outer atoms identical and symmetrically arranged? If yes, non-polar. If either fails, polar.
Intermolecular forces: the overview3.6.3
Simple molecular substances have two completely different kinds of attraction in them, and the whole topic depends on not confusing the two.
The one distinction that matters
Boiling water does not break O–H bonds. It separates water molecules from each other. The covalent bonds inside the molecule (464 kJ mol−1 for O–H) are untouched; only the intermolecular forces between molecules (about 20 kJ mol−1 per hydrogen bond) are overcome. Melting and boiling points of molecular substances are set by intermolecular forces, never by bond energies.
| Force | Present in | Typical strength / kJ mol−1 | Requires |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instantaneous dipole–induced dipole (id–id, London, dispersion) | every molecule and atom | 1 – 40+ | nothing — electrons are always moving |
| Permanent dipole–permanent dipole (pd–pd) | polar molecules only | 5 – 25 | a net molecular dipole |
| Hydrogen bonding | molecules with H bonded to N, O or F | 10 – 40 | H–N/O/F and a lone pair on N/O/F |
Instantaneous dipole–induced dipole forces
Electrons in a molecule are in constant motion. At any instant they are, by chance, unevenly distributed, so the molecule has a fleeting instantaneous dipole. That dipole repels the electrons of a neighbouring molecule, inducing a dipole in it that is aligned to attract. The instantaneous dipole vanishes and reappears elsewhere within about 10−15 s, but the correlation between neighbours persists, and the time-averaged result is a real, always-attractive force.
What makes them stronger
- More electrons (which usually means larger Mr). A bigger, more diffuse electron cloud is more polarisable: it distorts more easily, so the instantaneous dipoles are larger. This is the dominant factor.
- Greater surface contact. Long, thin molecules can lie alongside each other over their whole length; compact, spherical ones touch at fewer points. Branching reduces contact and therefore lowers the boiling point.
| Isomer of C5H12 | Shape | b.p. / °C |
|---|---|---|
| pentane | straight chain | 36 |
| 2-methylbutane | one branch | 28 |
| 2,2-dimethylpropane | near-spherical | 9.5 |
Common trap · "weakest force"
Textbooks call dispersion forces "the weakest intermolecular force". That is only true molecule-for-molecule at small size. In large molecules they are by far the largest contribution — iodine (Mr 254) is a solid at room temperature with nothing but dispersion forces holding it together, and dodecane boils at 216 °C. The Cambridge support notes make this point explicitly.
Permanent dipole–dipole forces
A polar molecule has a permanent δ+ end and δ− end. Neighbouring molecules line up δ+ to δ−, and the attraction is extra to the id–id forces that are always present. Because it requires alignment, it is strongly weakened by thermal motion, which is why its contribution is smaller than people expect.
| Pair | Mr | b.p. / °C | Forces present |
|---|---|---|---|
| butane, C4H10 | 58 | −0.5 | id–id only |
| propanone, CH3COCH3 | 58 | 56 | id–id + pd–pd |
| 2-methylpropane | 58 | −12 | id–id only |
| propanal, CH3CH2CHO | 58 | 49 | id–id + pd–pd |
Hydrogen bonding3.6.1
Definition
A hydrogen bond is the attraction between a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a highly electronegative atom (N, O or F) and a lone pair on the N, O or F of a neighbouring molecule.
Both halves of that definition are needed. Hydrogen bonded to N, O or F is unusually δ+ because those atoms are very electronegative and because hydrogen has no inner shell — strip away most of its single electron and what is exposed is a bare proton, an extremely concentrated positive charge. A lone pair on a small, electronegative neighbour can approach that charge very closely. The bond is directional: it is strongest when X–H···Y is linear.
Exam alert · drawing a hydrogen bond
- Draw a dashed line, not a solid one.
- Start it at the H, end it at a lone pair, and show that lone pair.
- Mark δ+ and δ−.
- Keep O–H···O roughly in a straight line.
- Do not draw a hydrogen bond to a carbon-bonded hydrogen — CH4 and CHCl3 do not hydrogen bond, however polar they look.
The evidence: boiling points of the hydrides
Down each group the hydrides get heavier, gain electrons, and boil at steadily higher temperatures — exactly as dispersion forces predict. Group 14 does this cleanly all the way. In Groups 15, 16 and 17 the first member breaks the pattern violently, and in every case that first member is the one that can hydrogen bond.
| Group | Period 2 | Period 3 | Period 4 | Period 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | CH4 −162 | SiH4 −112 | GeH4 −88 | SnH4 −52 |
| 15 | NH3 −33 | PH3 −88 | AsH3 −62 | SbH3 −17 |
| 16 | H2O 100 | H2S −60 | H2Se −41 | H2Te −2 |
| 17 | HF 20 | HCl −85 | HBr −67 | HI −35 |
Why water is strange3.6.4
Ice is less dense than water
Each water molecule can form four hydrogen bonds, arranged tetrahedrally. On freezing, the molecules take up the arrangement that satisfies all four, and that arrangement is an open, cage-like lattice containing large hexagonal holes. In liquid water the hydrogen bonds are constantly breaking and re-forming, so molecules can pack more closely — about 9% more closely. Ice therefore floats, and water reaches its maximum density at 4 °C rather than at its freezing point.
Why it matters beyond the exam
Ponds freeze from the top down, so the ice insulates the water below and aquatic life survives the winter. Almost no other substance behaves like this — for nearly everything else, the solid sinks in its own liquid.
The rest of the list
- High melting and boiling point — 0 °C and 100 °C, against −85 and −60 °C for H2S, which is a heavier molecule.
- High surface tension — a molecule at the surface has no neighbours above it, so the net hydrogen bonding pulls it inward. The surface behaves like an elastic membrane, which is why small insects can stand on water and why droplets are spherical.
- High specific heat capacity and enthalpy of vaporisation — a great deal of energy goes into breaking hydrogen bonds, which is what makes sweating an effective coolant and oceans a thermal buffer.
- Solvent for ionic and polar substances — the molecular dipole lets water surround ions and hydrogen bond to sugars, alcohols and proteins.
- Ethanol mixes with water in all proportions, while ethane does not dissolve at all: the O–H group can hydrogen bond into the water network, a C–H group cannot.
Deciding which forces act
The routine, in order
- Is it a molecular substance at all? If it is ionic, metallic or giant covalent, stop — there are no intermolecular forces to discuss.
- id–id forces are always present. Say so; estimate their size from the number of electrons and the molecular shape.
- Is the molecule polar? Shape first, then symmetry. If polar, add permanent dipole–dipole.
- Is there H bonded directly to N, O or F? If yes, and a lone pair is available, add hydrogen bonding.
- Compare like with like. When comparing two substances, say which forces each has and comment on the number of electrons — a comparison that ignores Mr is incomplete.
Topics 4.2 and 3.5
Bonding and structure · Shapes of molecules
Bonding decides what holds the particles together. Structure decides how they are arranged, and between them they fix every physical property. Then, for molecules, shape decides polarity, packing and — later in the course — reactivity.
The four types of crystal
| Giant ionic | Giant metallic | Giant covalent | Simple molecular | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice points | ions | cations in an electron sea | atoms | molecules |
| Held by | ionic bonds | metallic bonds | covalent bonds | intermolecular forces |
| m.p. / b.p. | high | usually high | very high | low |
| Hardness | hard, brittle | malleable, ductile | very hard (graphite soft) | soft |
| Electrical conductivity | only molten / aqueous | good, solid and liquid | none (graphite conducts) | none |
| Solubility in water | often soluble | insoluble (may react) | insoluble | only if polar / H-bonding |
| Examples | NaCl, MgO, CaF2 | Na, Mg, Fe, Cu | diamond, graphite, SiO2 | I2, ice, CO2(s), S8 |
Exam alert · the melting-point question
"Explain why sodium chloride has a much higher melting point than iodine." A full answer names both structures, names both forces, and says what is overcome: NaCl is a giant ionic lattice, so melting must overcome strong electrostatic attractions between oppositely charged ions throughout the lattice; iodine is simple molecular, so melting only has to overcome weak instantaneous dipole–induced dipole forces between I2 molecules — the covalent bonds within the molecules are not broken. The last clause is where most marks are lost.
Replacing a broken animation
Three of the original animations for this part of the course could not be recovered — their data is incomplete at source, which no emulator can repair. Each has been replaced here by a live simulation that does the same job: the structure–property matcher below, the covalent-structure property explorer at the end of Simple molecular crystals, and the VSEPR shape builder in Shapes of molecules and ions.
Ionic and metallic lattices in detail
Sodium chloride: 6:6 coordination
Each Na+ is surrounded octahedrally by six Cl− ions, and each Cl− by six Na+ — a face-centred cubic arrangement. The formula NaCl states the ratio, 1:1; there is no such thing as an NaCl molecule. Caesium chloride, whose cation is larger, achieves 8:8 coordination instead, showing that the packing arrangement is set by the relative sizes of the ions.
Why ionic solids are brittle
Apply enough force to slide one plane of ions over the next by half a lattice spacing and every ion is now adjacent to an ion of the same charge. The lattice does not deform, it repels itself apart, and the crystal cleaves along a flat plane. Compare a metal, where sliding one plane over another changes nothing because the electron sea is indifferent to where the cations are.
Close packing in metals
Metal atoms are effectively spheres of equal size with non-directional bonding, so they pack as efficiently as spheres can — 74% of space filled. There are two ways to stack the layers:
- ABAB… — hexagonal close packing (hcp): Mg, Zn, Ti.
- ABCABC… — cubic close packing (ccp, = face-centred cubic): Cu, Ag, Au, Al.
Both give each atom 12 nearest neighbours. Some metals adopt the slightly less efficient body-centred cubic arrangement (68%, 8 nearest neighbours): the Group 1 metals, and iron at room temperature.
Giant covalent structures
Diamond
- Every carbon is sp3 hybridised and bonded to four others, tetrahedrally, at 109.5°, with C–C = 0.154 nm.
- The covalent network extends through the whole crystal — a diamond is, in effect, one molecule.
- Extremely hard and melting above 3500 °C: melting or scratching it means breaking covalent bonds.
- Does not conduct electricity — all four outer electrons of every atom are localised in σ bonds, so there are no mobile charge carriers.
- Conducts heat superbly (better than any metal at room temperature) because the stiff, perfectly ordered lattice transmits vibrations extremely efficiently.
- Insoluble in every solvent; there is nothing a solvent could detach.
Graphite
- Every carbon is sp2 hybridised and bonded to three others in flat hexagonal layers, at 120°, with C–C = 0.142 nm — shorter and stronger than in diamond because of the partial π character.
- The fourth electron of each atom occupies an unhybridised p orbital perpendicular to the layer. These overlap sideways across the whole sheet, producing a delocalised π system.
- Conducts electricity along the layers because those delocalised electrons are mobile — and much less well perpendicular to them. This is the exception to "covalent substances do not conduct".
- Soft, slippery, used as a lubricant and in pencils: the layers are 0.335 nm apart, held only by dispersion forces, so they slide over one another easily.
- Melting point is still enormous (sublimes above 3600 °C) because melting requires breaking the covalent bonds within the layers.
- Less dense than diamond (2.27 vs 3.51 g cm−3) because the layered structure wastes space.
The comparison examiners want
Diamond and graphite are made of the same atoms and differ only in arrangement, so any property difference must be traced to structure. Hardness → 3D network vs weakly held layers. Conductivity → four localised electrons vs three localised plus one delocalised. Density → tetrahedral packing vs open layers. Melting point → both very high, because in both cases covalent bonds must break; this is the one property where they agree, and saying "graphite melts easily because the layers slide" is wrong.
Other allotropes and networks
| Structure | Arrangement | Distinctive property |
|---|---|---|
| Graphene | a single graphite layer, one atom thick | Strongest material measured; excellent conductor; effectively transparent |
| Fullerene, C60 | closed cage of 20 hexagons and 12 pentagons | Simple molecular, not giant — soluble in benzene, sublimes at 800 K, soft |
| Nanotubes | rolled graphene cylinders | Very high tensile strength; conducting or semiconducting depending on how they are rolled |
| Silicon(IV) oxide, SiO2 | every Si bonded to 4 O, every O to 2 Si | Giant covalent, m.p. 1710 °C, hard, insulating — the structural analogue of diamond |
Simple molecular crystals
The lattice points are whole molecules, and only intermolecular forces hold them in place. Everything follows: low melting and boiling points, softness, no conductivity in any state, and solubility governed by whether the solvent can offer similar forces.
Iodine
I2 molecules sit at the points of a face-centred cubic lattice, held by dispersion forces only. Iodine still melts at 114 °C — high for a molecular solid — because each molecule has 106 electrons and is highly polarisable. It sublimes readily to a violet vapour, and dissolves in hexane (dispersion forces on both sides) far better than in water.
Ice
Water molecules held in an open tetrahedral network of hydrogen bonds, four per molecule. Compared with iodine, ice melts at a much lower temperature (0 °C) even though hydrogen bonds are individually stronger than iodine's dispersion forces — because a water molecule has only 10 electrons, and there are far fewer forces per unit volume to break.
Shapes of molecules and ions3.5.1–3.5.2
The principle
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion. The electron pairs in the outer shell of the central atom all repel one another, so they arrange themselves as far apart in space as possible. The shape of the molecule is then the arrangement of the atoms within that electron-pair geometry.
Repulsion strength runs: lone pair–lone pair > lone pair–bonding pair > bonding pair–bonding pair.
Why a lone pair repels more
A bonding pair is pulled out between two nuclei and is therefore relatively compact and localised. A lone pair is held by only one nucleus, so it spreads out closer to the central atom and occupies a wider angular region. Being fatter and nearer, it pushes the bonding pairs away harder — closing the bond angle by roughly 2.5° per lone pair.
The method, in four steps
- Count the outer-shell electrons of the central atom.
- Add one electron per single bond to a monovalent atom such as H or a halogen. For a double bond, add nothing extra — a double bond counts as one region of electron density and the two electrons the central atom contributes are already counted. For a dative bond in which the central atom is the acceptor, add two.
- Adjust for charge: subtract one electron per positive charge, add one per negative charge.
- Divide by two to get the total number of electron pairs; subtract the number of bonded atoms (bonding regions) to find the lone pairs. Then read the shape off the table.
Worked example 1 · NH3
N is in Group 15, so 5 outer electrons. Three N–H bonds add 3 → 8 electrons → 4 pairs. Three of them are bonding, so 1 lone pair. Four pairs arrange tetrahedrally; with one position occupied by a lone pair the atoms form a trigonal pyramid. The single lone pair compresses the ideal 109.5° to 107°.
Worked example 2 · SF4
S is in Group 16, so 6 outer electrons; four S–F bonds add 4 → 10 → 5 pairs, of which 4 are bonding and 1 is a lone pair. Five pairs are trigonal bipyramidal. The lone pair takes an equatorial position — at 120° it has only two neighbours at 90°, whereas an axial position would put it at 90° to three — so the shape is a see-saw, with angles compressed to about 117° and 89°.
Worked example 3 · SO42−
S has 6 outer electrons. The two negative charges add 2 → 8 → 4 pairs. Four bonded oxygens, so no lone pairs: a regular tetrahedron, 109.5°.
The complete table
| Pairs | Bonding | Lone | Electron-pair geometry | Shape of the molecule | Bond angle | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | linear | linear | 180° | BeCl2, CO2 |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | trigonal planar | trigonal planar | 120° | BF3, SO3 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | trigonal planar | bent | ≈119° | SO2 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | tetrahedral | tetrahedral | 109.5° | CH4, NH4+, SO42− |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | tetrahedral | trigonal pyramidal | 107° | NH3, H3O+, PCl3 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | tetrahedral | bent | 104.5° | H2O, H2S |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | trigonal bipyramidal | trigonal bipyramidal | 120° and 90° | PCl5 |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | trigonal bipyramidal | see-saw | ≈117°, 89° | SF4 |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | trigonal bipyramidal | T-shaped | ≈87.5° | ClF3 |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | trigonal bipyramidal | linear | 180° | XeF2, I3− |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | octahedral | octahedral | 90° | SF6 |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | octahedral | square pyramidal | ≈89° | BrF5 |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | octahedral | square planar | 90° | XeF4 |
The effect of lone pairs on bond angles
Within one electron-pair geometry, each lone pair you add closes the bond angle by roughly 2.5°. The classic series is the isoelectronic set of four-pair molecules:
| Molecule | Bonding pairs | Lone pairs | Shape | Bond angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH4 | 4 | 0 | tetrahedral | 109.5° |
| NH3 | 3 | 1 | trigonal pyramidal | 107° |
| H2O | 2 | 2 | bent | 104.5° |
Double bonds, ions and unfamiliar molecules3.5.2
Exam alert · statement 3.5.2
The syllabus explicitly allows examiners to ask about molecules that are not in the list. As the Cambridge support notes say: there is no substitute for understanding this — if you learn examples parrot-fashion you will not cope with unfamiliar cases.
A double bond is one region of electron density
For shape purposes, treat C=O exactly as you would treat C–O. CO2 has two regions, so it is linear. SO3 has three, so it is trigonal planar.
SO2: the one you must know
Sulfur contributes 6 outer electrons. Two S=O double bonds add nothing (the double bond uses the sulfur's own electrons), so 6 electrons → 3 pairs: two bonding regions and one lone pair. Three regions are trigonal planar; with one being a lone pair the molecule is bent at about 119° — and therefore polar, unlike the linear, non-polar CO2.
ClO2: why understanding beats memorising
Chlorine dioxide looks like carbon dioxide on paper, yet it is bent, not linear. Chlorine has seven outer electrons; two are used in the double bonds, leaving five — two lone pairs and one unpaired electron on the central atom. That gives three regions of electron density round chlorine, so the electron geometry is trigonal planar and the molecule is bent, at about 117°. A molecule with an odd number of electrons cannot have a symmetrical pair arrangement.
Shapes of ions
| Ion | Outer e− on central atom | Charge adjustment | Total pairs | Lone pairs | Shape | Angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+ | 5 + 4 = 9 | −1 → 8 | 4 | 0 | tetrahedral | 109.5° |
| H3O+ | 6 + 3 = 9 | −1 → 8 | 4 | 1 | trigonal pyramidal | ≈107° |
| NO3− | 5 | +1 → 6 | 3 | 0 | trigonal planar | 120° |
| SO42− | 6 | +2 → 8 | 4 | 0 | tetrahedral | 109.5° |
| ICl4− | 7 + 4 = 11 | +1 → 12 | 6 | 2 | square planar | 90° |
Common trap · naming the shape
Name the arrangement of the atoms, not of the electron pairs. Water is bent, not tetrahedral, even though its four pairs are tetrahedrally arranged. Writing "H2O is tetrahedral" scores zero.
Review
Review and data
Self-test30 questions
Written to the style of 9701 Paper 1 and the short-answer parts of Paper 2. Answers explain the reasoning, not just the letter.
Definitions to learn word for word
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Ionic bond | The electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions. |
| Covalent bond | The electrostatic attraction between two nuclei and the shared pair of electrons between them. |
| Dative covalent bond | A covalent bond in which both electrons of the shared pair come from the same atom. |
| Metallic bond | The electrostatic attraction between a lattice of positive metal ions and the delocalised electrons. |
| Electronegativity | The ability of an atom to attract the pair of electrons in a covalent bond towards itself. |
| Bond energy | The energy needed to break one mole of a covalent bond to give separated atoms, all species being in the gas state. |
| Bond length | The distance between the nuclei of two covalently bonded atoms. |
| σ bond | A bond formed by end-on overlap of atomic orbitals along the internuclear axis. |
| π bond | A bond formed by sideways overlap of p orbitals above and below the internuclear axis. |
| Hydrogen bond | The attraction between a δ+ hydrogen atom bonded to N, O or F and a lone pair on the N, O or F of a neighbouring molecule. |
| id–id force | The attraction arising when a temporary, instantaneous dipole in one molecule induces a dipole in a neighbour. |
| Permanent dipole–dipole force | The attraction between the δ+ end of one polar molecule and the δ− end of another. |
| Polarising power | The ability of a cation to distort the electron cloud of a neighbouring anion; greatest for small, highly charged cations. |
| Polarisability | How readily an ion's or molecule's electron cloud is distorted; greatest for large, highly charged anions and large molecules. |
| VSEPR | Electron pairs in the outer shell of the central atom repel one another and arrange themselves as far apart as possible; lp–lp > lp–bp > bp–bp. |
Data used on this page
All numerical values quoted here are reference data taken from standard tabulations, given so that trends can be compared. They are not a substitute for the Cambridge data booklet you are given in the examination, and any calculation you submit should use the booklet's values.
Pauling electronegativities used by the simulations
| Element | χ | Element | χ | Element | χ | Element | χ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 2.20 | Li | 0.98 | Be | 1.57 | B | 2.04 |
| C | 2.55 | N | 3.04 | O | 3.44 | F | 3.98 |
| Na | 0.93 | Mg | 1.31 | Al | 1.61 | Si | 1.90 |
| P | 2.19 | S | 2.58 | Cl | 3.16 | K | 0.82 |
| Ca | 1.00 | Ti | 1.54 | Fe | 1.83 | Cu | 1.90 |
| Zn | 1.65 | Ga | 1.81 | Ge | 2.01 | As | 2.18 |
| Se | 2.55 | Br | 2.96 | Rb | 0.82 | Sr | 0.95 |
| Ag | 1.93 | Sn | 1.96 | Sb | 2.05 | Te | 2.10 |
| I | 2.66 | Xe | 2.60 | Cs | 0.79 | Ba | 0.89 |
| Pb | 2.33 | Au | 2.54 | Hg | 2.00 | Ba | 0.89 |
Average bond energies and bond lengths
| Bond | Energy / kJ mol−1 | Length / nm | Bond | Energy / kJ mol−1 | Length / nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H–H | 436 | 0.074 | C–H | 410 | 0.109 |
| C–C | 350 | 0.154 | C=C | 610 | 0.134 |
| C≡C | 840 | 0.120 | C–O | 360 | 0.143 |
| C=O | 805 | 0.122 | O–H | 465 | 0.096 |
| N–H | 390 | 0.101 | N–N | 160 | 0.145 |
| N≡N | 944 | 0.110 | O=O | 496 | 0.121 |
| F–F | 158 | 0.142 | Cl–Cl | 242 | 0.199 |
| Br–Br | 193 | 0.228 | I–I | 151 | 0.267 |
| H–F | 562 | 0.092 | H–Cl | 432 | 0.127 |
| H–Br | 366 | 0.141 | H–I | 298 | 0.161 |
| C–F | 467 | 0.138 | C–Cl | 346 | 0.177 |
| C–Br | 290 | 0.193 | C–I | 228 | 0.214 |