What this chapter covers13
Organic chemistry looks, at first, like an enormous amount of memorising. It is not. Almost everything in the rest of this course follows from four small ideas introduced here: that a molecule can be written down in several different ways and you must be fluent in all of them; that the reactions of a compound are decided by one small part of it; that a carbon atom takes one of three shapes depending on how many things are attached to it; and that two molecules can share a formula and still be different compounds. Get these right and the later topics become a short list of reactions attached to ideas you already have. Get them wrong and every later topic feels like a new subject.
What topic 13 asks you to do
13.1 Formulae, functional groups and the naming of organic compounds
13.1.1 define the term hydrocarbon as a compound made up
of C and H atoms only
13.1.2 understand that alkanes are simple hydrocarbons with no functional group
13.1.3 understand that the compounds in the syllabus table contain a functional group which
dictates their physical and chemical properties
13.1.4 interpret and use the general, structural, displayed and skeletal formulae of those
classes of compound
13.1.5 understand and use systematic nomenclature of simple aliphatic organic molecules with
those functional groups, up to six carbon atoms (six plus six for esters; straight chains only for
esters and nitriles)
13.1.6 deduce the molecular and/or empirical formula of a compound, given its structural,
displayed or skeletal formula
13.2 Characteristic organic reactions
13.2.1 interpret and use the terms: (a) homologous series
(b) saturated and unsaturated (c) homolytic and heterolytic fission (d) free
radical, initiation, propagation, termination (e) nucleophile, electrophile, nucleophilic,
electrophilic (f) addition, substitution, elimination, hydrolysis, condensation
(g) oxidation and reduction — [O] represents one atom of oxygen from an oxidising agent and
[H] one atom of hydrogen from a reducing agent
13.2.2 understand and use the terminology: (a) free-radical substitution
(b) electrophilic addition (c) nucleophilic substitution (d) nucleophilic
addition — curly arrows to represent movement of electron pairs is expected; the arrow should begin
at a bond or a lone pair of electrons
13.3 Shapes of organic molecules; σ and π bonds
13.3.1 describe organic molecules as either straight-chained,
branched or cyclic
13.3.2 describe and explain the shape of, and bond angles in, molecules containing sp,
sp2 and sp3 hybridised atoms
13.3.3 describe the arrangement of σ and π bonds in molecules containing sp, sp2
and sp3 hybridised atoms
13.3.4 understand and use the term planar when describing the arrangement of atoms
in organic molecules, for example ethene
13.4 Isomerism: structural isomerism and stereoisomerism
13.4.1 describe structural isomerism and its division into chain,
positional and functional group isomerism
13.4.2 describe stereoisomerism and its division into geometrical (cis/trans) and optical
isomerism (use of E/Z nomenclature is acceptable but is not required)
13.4.3 describe geometrical (cis/trans) isomerism in alkenes, and explain its origin in terms
of restricted rotation due to the presence of π bonds
13.4.4 explain what is meant by a chiral centre and that such a centre gives rise to two
optical isomers (enantiomers)
13.4.5 identify chiral centres and geometrical (cis/trans) isomerism in a molecule of given
structural formula including cyclic compounds
13.4.6 deduce the possible isomers for an organic molecule of known molecular formula
Read the verbs, because they set the price of each statement. 13.1.4 says interpret and use — you have to go both ways, from a structure to a formula and from a formula to a structure. 13.1.5 says understand and use, which means producing a name you have never seen for a molecule you have never seen, not recognising one from a list. 13.3.2 says describe and explain: a bond angle on its own is half an answer. And 13.4.6, which asks you to deduce every isomer of a molecular formula, is the one statement on this page that is pure method — there is nothing to learn, only a procedure to carry out without missing anything.
What this page covers, and what it leaves out
This page is topic 13 and nothing else. It is the vocabulary and the machinery; the reactions themselves live in the topics that follow. So the four mechanism names in 13.2.2 are introduced here and defined here, but each one is carried out in its own topic — free-radical substitution in 14.1, electrophilic addition in 14.2, nucleophilic substitution in 15, nucleophilic addition in 17. You will meet the terms in 13.2.1 the same way: named here, used repeatedly for the next eight topics.
Esters and nitriles appear in the syllabus table for 13.1, and their naming rules are mentioned where they matter, but their chemistry belongs to topics 18 and 19 and is not attempted here.
Hydrocarbons, alkanes and the idea of a functional group13.1.1–13.1.3
Three statements, and the first two are one sentence each.
The definitions to write down exactly
Hydrocarbon — a compound made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms only.
Alkane — a simple hydrocarbon with no functional group: carbon–carbon single bonds and carbon–hydrogen bonds, and nothing else.
Functional group — the atom or group of atoms in a molecule that is responsible for its characteristic chemical reactions.
The word that earns the mark in the first definition is only. Ethanol, CH3CH2OH, contains carbon and hydrogen; it is not a hydrocarbon, because it also contains oxygen. Poly(ethene) is a hydrocarbon. Chloromethane is not. It is a narrow definition and examiners test its edges.
The second statement is more interesting than it looks. Saying an alkane has no functional group is a claim about its chemistry: there is no part of the molecule that a reagent can pick out. Every bond in an alkane is either C–C or C–H, both strong and both very nearly non-polar, so there is nowhere for a polar reagent to attack and nothing for a nucleophile to find. That is the whole explanation of why alkanes are so unreactive, and it is examined directly in 14.1.5.
Why a functional group can carry a whole topic
Butane, C4H10, boils at −0.5 °C and is essentially inert. Butan-1-ol, C4H9OH, differs by one oxygen atom; it boils at 118 °C, mixes with water, reacts with sodium, can be oxidised twice over and dehydrated to an alkene. One –OH group changed everything. That is what 13.1.3 means by "dictates their physical and chemical properties", and it is why the rest of the course is organised by functional group rather than by molecule.
The classes of compound you are given13.1.3
The syllabus supplies a table of functional groups in the exam, so the job is not to memorise it but to recognise a group on sight and know what it does. The eight classes below are the ones this course uses most; esters and nitriles are in the table too, with their chemistry in later topics.
| class | functional group | general formula | example | name ends in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| alkane | none | CnH2n+2 | propane, CH3CH2CH3 | -ane |
| alkene | C=C | CnH2n | propene, CH2=CHCH3 | -ene |
| halogenoalkane | C–X (X = F, Cl, Br, I) | CnH2n+1X | chloroethane, CH3CH2Cl | halogeno- prefix |
| alcohol | –OH | CnH2n+1OH | ethanol, CH3CH2OH | -ol |
| aldehyde | –CHO (C=O at the end) | CnH2nO | ethanal, CH3CHO | -al |
| ketone | C=O inside the chain | CnH2nO | propanone, CH3COCH3 | -one |
| carboxylic acid | –COOH | CnH2n+1COOH | ethanoic acid, CH3COOH | -oic acid |
| amine | –NH2 | CnH2n+1NH2 | ethylamine, CH3CH2NH2 | -amine |
| ester | –COO– | — | ethyl ethanoate, CH3COOC2H5 | -yl -oate |
| nitrile | –C≡N | CnH2n+1CN | propanenitrile, CH3CH2CN | -nitrile |
Aldehyde or ketone — the difference is position, not composition
Both contain C=O and both have the general formula CnH2nO. What separates them is where that carbon sits: an aldehyde's carbonyl carbon is at the end of the chain and therefore carries a hydrogen; a ketone's is inside the chain and carries two carbon groups. Propanal and propanone are both C3H6O and they are functional group isomers of each other — a fact that comes back in 13.4.1 and again in topic 17, where one reduces silver ions and the other does not.
Five ways to write the same molecule13.1.4
Statement 13.1.4 is one of the most important in the whole syllabus, and it is worth being blunt about why: every organic question you will ever answer begins by turning something written on paper into a molecule in your head. If you cannot do that step reliably, nothing that follows can be attempted. There are five ways of writing a molecule down, and each throws away a different amount of information.
| form | what it shows | what it throws away | ethanoic acid |
|---|---|---|---|
| empirical | the simplest whole-number ratio of atoms | how many atoms there actually are, and everything about arrangement | CH2O |
| molecular | how many of each atom are in one molecule | everything about arrangement | C2H4O2 |
| structural | enough of the arrangement to identify the compound, written on one line | the individual bonds, and the shape | CH3COOH |
| displayed | every atom and every bond | the true three-dimensional shape | drawn out in full |
| skeletal | the carbon skeleton as lines, with functional groups written in | the carbons and hydrogens, which you have to put back yourself | a short zig-zag with COOH |
Reading a skeletal formula
Skeletal formulae appear constantly in Cambridge papers, and they are the form students most often misread. Three rules cover every case:
- Every corner and every free end of the line is a carbon atom. A line of five segments therefore has six carbons, not five.
- Every carbon has four bonds. Whatever is not drawn is hydrogen, so count the lines meeting that corner and add hydrogens until you reach four.
- Anything that is not carbon or hydrogen is written in — O, N, Cl, and the hydrogens attached directly to them.
Worked example — skeletal to molecular
A zig-zag of three line segments, with an OH written at one end.
Three segments means three C–C bonds, so four carbons. Number them from the OH end. C1 carries the OH and two bonds (one to O, one to C2), so it needs 2 H. C2 and C3 each have two bonds to carbon, so 2 H each. C4 has one bond to carbon, so 3 H. Total hydrogen on carbon = 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 = 9, plus the one on the oxygen = 10.
Molecular formula C4H10O. The compound is butan-1-ol.
The commonest skeletal mistake
Counting the lines as the carbons. A skeletal hexane is five lines, and a student who reports C5H12 has lost the question before starting. Count the ends and corners. If it helps, put a dot on each one before you count.
The second commonest is forgetting that a double bond drawn skeletally still uses up bonding positions: a corner with a double bond on one side and a single bond on the other has three bonds already and takes only one hydrogen.
General formulae and homologous series13.1.4, 13.2.1(a)
Homologous series
A family of compounds with the same functional group, which can be represented by one general formula, whose successive members differ by CH2, which have similar chemical properties, and whose physical properties change gradually along the series.
Five clauses. A question worth two or three marks expects three or four of them, and "they are all similar" earns nothing.
The general formula is the part that does real work. CnH2n+2 is not a piece of trivia about alkanes — it is a statement that a saturated chain of n carbons has exactly 2n+2 hydrogens, which lets you check any structure you have drawn in two seconds. If your "C5H12" isomer comes out with 11 hydrogens, you have left a carbon with three bonds somewhere.
| series | general formula | first member | C4 member |
|---|---|---|---|
| alkanes | CnH2n+2 | CH4 | C4H10 |
| alkenes (one C=C) | CnH2n | C2H4 | C4H8 |
| alkynes (one C≡C) | CnH2n−2 | C2H2 | C4H6 |
| alcohols | CnH2n+1OH | CH3OH | C4H9OH |
| aldehydes | CnH2n+1CHO | HCHO | C3H7CHO |
| ketones | CnH2nO | CH3COCH3 | C4H8O |
| carboxylic acids | CnH2n+1COOH | HCOOH | C3H7COOH |
| cycloalkanes | CnH2n | C3H6 | C4H8 |
CnH2n belongs to two series at once
An alkene and a cycloalkane have the same general formula, because a ring and a double bond cost the same two hydrogens. C4H8 could be but-1-ene, but-2-ene, 2-methylpropene or cyclobutane — and a question that gives you only the molecular formula is usually testing exactly that. The same is true of CnH2nO, which covers both aldehydes and ketones.
Molecular and empirical formulae from a structure13.1.6
This statement asks for one skill in two directions. Going from a structure to a molecular formula is careful counting; going from a molecular formula to an empirical formula is arithmetic.
To get the molecular formula: count the atoms. From a structural formula it is bookkeeping — CH3(CH2)2COOH is 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 carbons, 3 + 4 + 1 = 8 hydrogens, and 2 oxygens, so C4H8O2. From a skeletal formula it is the three rules above. From a displayed formula it is simply slow and careful reading, and the only real danger is missing something.
To get the empirical formula: divide every subscript by their highest common factor. C2H4O2 → CH2O. C6H6 → CH. C4H10 → C2H5. Very often the factor is 1 and the two formulae are identical, which is a correct answer, not a failure to simplify.
Why the empirical formula is a one-way street
You can always get the empirical formula from the molecular one. You can never go back without extra information, because CH2O could be methanal (C1), ethanoic acid (C2), lactic acid (C3) or glucose (C6) — all of them (CH2O)n. That extra information is the relative molecular mass, and the combination of the two is how a structure is deduced from combustion data, which is topic 2.4.
Worked example — degree of unsaturation, and why it is worth two seconds
A compound is C4H6. An alkane with four carbons would be C4H10, so four hydrogens are missing — two pairs.
degree of unsaturation = (2 × 4 + 2 − 6) ÷ 2 = 2
Two units means any two of: a ring, a C=C, or half a C≡C. So C4H6 can be but-1-yne, buta-1,3-diene, cyclobutene or methylcyclopropene — and knowing there are exactly two units to place is what stops you drawing a fifth structure that is really a duplicate.
Naming: the four decisions13.1.5
Systematic naming is not a list to learn. It is four decisions taken in a fixed order, and once you take them in that order the name assembles itself. Every name has the same shape:
(locants)-(substituents) + stem + (un)saturation + suffix
The four decisions, in order
1 · Which is the principal functional group? It fixes the ending. If there is more than one, the senior one wins: carboxylic acid, then aldehyde, then ketone, then alcohol, then amine. Everything less senior becomes a prefix (hydroxy-, amino-, oxo-).
2 · Which is the parent chain? The longest continuous chain of carbons that contains the principal group. If two chains tie for length, take the one with more double or triple bonds. The number of carbons in it gives the stem: meth, eth, prop, but, pent, hex.
3 · From which end do you number? The end that gives the principal group the lowest number. If there is no principal group, the end that gives the multiple bond the lowest number. If there is neither, the end that gives the substituents the lowest set of numbers.
4 · What is attached, and where? Name each substituent, put its locant in front, list them alphabetically, and use di-, tri-, tetra- for repeats. The multiplier does not count for alphabetical order: ethyl comes before dimethyl.
Worked example — (CH3)2CHCH2CH3
1 · No functional group, so no suffix beyond -ane.
2 · Write it out: CH3–CH(CH3)–CH2–CH3. The longest chain is four carbons — not five, because the fifth carbon is a branch off the second. Stem = but.
3 · Numbering left to right puts the methyl branch on carbon 2; right to left puts it on carbon 3. Take 2.
4 · One methyl group at position 2.
Name: 2-methylbutane. Not 3-methylbutane, and not 2-methylpentane — there is no five-carbon chain in this molecule.
The longest chain is not always the one drawn straight
Structures are usually drawn with a horizontal backbone and branches hanging off it, and students read the horizontal line as the parent chain. It often is not. In
CH3CH2CH(CH2CH3)CH3
the horizontal chain is four carbons, but turning the corner into the ethyl branch gives a chain of five: this is 3-methylpentane, not 3-ethylbutane. Trace every possible route through the carbons before committing to one.
Naming with a functional group13.1.5
Once there is a functional group, decision 1 takes over from decision 3 — the group gets the lowest locant whatever that does to the substituents.
| group | how it appears in the name | example |
|---|---|---|
| C=C | -ene, with a locant from C4 upwards | but-2-ene |
| –OH | -ol, with a locant from C3 upwards | propan-2-ol |
| –CHO | -al; no locant is needed, since it can only be carbon 1 | butanal |
| C=O in the chain | -one, with a locant from C5 upwards | pentan-3-one |
| –COOH | -oic acid; no locant, since it must be carbon 1 | propanoic acid |
| –NH2 | alkyl + amine at this level | ethylamine |
| halogen | fluoro-, chloro-, bromo-, iodo- as a prefix with a locant | 2-bromobutane |
Where the locant goes, and when you can leave it out
Cambridge writes the locant immediately before the suffix it belongs to: propan-2-ol, but-2-ene, pentan-3-one. Writing "2-propanol" is an older style and is not what this syllabus uses.
Leave a locant out only when there is genuinely no choice. Propene needs none, because a three-carbon chain numbered from either end puts the double bond between carbons 1 and 2. Butene needs one, because but-1-ene and but-2-ene are different compounds. A carboxylic acid or an aldehyde never needs one, because that carbon is always carbon 1 — writing "propan-1-oic acid" suggests you have not understood why.
Worked example — CH3CH(OH)CH2CH(CH3)CH3
1 · There is an –OH, so the name ends in -ol.
2 · Longest chain containing the –OH carbon: five carbons, so pentan.
3 · Numbering from the –OH end puts the OH on carbon 2; from the other end it would be carbon 4. The group decides, so number from the –OH end even though it makes the methyl locant larger.
4 · That puts the methyl branch on carbon 4.
Name: 4-methylpentan-2-ol. A student who numbered for the lowest substituent locant would write 2-methylpentan-4-ol, which is wrong for exactly one reason — the functional group outranks the branch.
Why naming is worth more than the marks it carries
Almost no question is worth much for the name itself. But an exam sentence like "suggest the product when 2-bromobutane is heated with ethanolic sodium hydroxide" is unanswerable unless the name turns into a structure in your head, at once, without effort. Chemguide's advice on this statement is worth repeating exactly: if an exam asks you about a named compound and you cannot draw its structure, you almost certainly cannot do the question.
Breaking bonds: homolytic and heterolytic fission13.2.1(c)–(d)
A covalent bond is a shared pair of electrons. When it breaks, the pair has to go somewhere, and there are exactly two possibilities: one electron to each atom, or both to one atom. Everything about organic mechanisms follows from which of the two happens.
The two fissions
Homolytic fission — the bonding pair splits evenly, one electron to each atom. Two free radicals are produced: species with an unpaired electron, written with a dot, Cl•. Everything stays neutral.
Heterolytic fission — both electrons go to one atom. One positive ion and one negative ion are produced. The atom that keeps the pair is the more electronegative one.
Which one happens is decided by the bond. A non-polar bond — Cl–Cl, Br–Br, C–H — has no reason to give both electrons to one end, so when it is supplied with enough energy by ultraviolet light or by heat it breaks homolytically. A polar bond — C–Br, C–O, C=O — is already pulling electrons towards one atom, and in a polar solvent that pull can be completed: it breaks heterolytically.
The three stages of a radical chain
Initiation — radicals are made from a molecule that had none, by homolytic fission. One molecule in, two radicals out.
Propagation — a radical reacts with a molecule and produces a new radical. One radical in, one radical out, so the chain continues. These steps repeat thousands of times per initiation.
Termination — two radicals combine. Two radicals in, none out, so the chain stops.
The bookkeeping is the check: count the radicals on each side of every step you write. 0 → 2 is initiation, 1 → 1 is propagation, 2 → 0 is termination. A step that does not fit one of those three patterns is wrong.
The mechanism itself is carried out in topic 14.1, where alkanes react with chlorine in ultraviolet light. What matters here is the vocabulary, because 13.2.1(d) names all four terms and they are examined as definitions in their own right.
Nucleophiles and electrophiles13.2.1(e)
The two definitions
Nucleophile — a species that donates a lone pair of electrons to form a new covalent bond. "Nucleus-loving": it seeks out a positive or δ+ centre.
Electrophile — a species that accepts a lone pair of electrons to form a new covalent bond. "Electron-loving": it seeks out a region of high electron density.
The adjectives follow: a nucleophilic reaction is one in which a nucleophile does the attacking, and an electrophilic reaction one in which an electrophile does.
| nucleophiles | why | electrophiles | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| OH− | negative, with three lone pairs on oxygen | Hδ+–Brδ− | the hydrogen end is electron-poor |
| CN− | negative, lone pair on carbon | Br2 | no dipole until one is induced in it |
| NH3 | neutral, but a lone pair on nitrogen | NO2+ | full positive charge on nitrogen |
| H2O | neutral, two lone pairs on oxygen | a carbocation, R3C+ | only six electrons round the carbon |
"An electrophile is a positive ion"
Many are, but this is not the definition and the exception matters. Bromine, Br2, is a perfectly symmetrical non-polar molecule, and it is the electrophile in the most-tested reaction of the whole alkene topic. It becomes one only when it approaches the C=C: the π electrons repel the electrons in the near bromine atom, an induced dipole appears, and the near atom is now δ+. Define an electrophile by what it does — accepts a lone pair — and the exception stops being one.
The mirror-image error is "a nucleophile is a negative ion". Ammonia and water are both neutral and both nucleophiles.
Naming the reaction13.2.1(f)
Five words, and each one describes what happened to the molecules rather than what the reagent was. You can work out which applies by counting.
| term | what happens | the test | example |
|---|---|---|---|
| addition | two molecules become one | nothing is released; the degree of unsaturation falls | CH2=CH2 + Br2 → CH2BrCH2Br |
| substitution | one atom or group is swapped for another | a small molecule leaves; unsaturation unchanged | CH3CH3 + Cl2 → CH3CH2Cl + HCl |
| elimination | one molecule becomes two | a small molecule leaves; unsaturation rises | CH3CH2Br → CH2=CH2 + HBr |
| hydrolysis | a bond is split by water | water is a reactant and ends up in the products | CH3CH2Br + H2O → CH3CH2OH + HBr |
| condensation | two molecules join with loss of a small molecule | two organic reactants, one organic product, plus H2O or HCl | acid + alcohol → ester + H2O |
Two labels can both be right
Hydrolysis of a halogenoalkane is also a substitution — the two words answer different questions. "Substitution" says what happened to the carbon skeleton; "hydrolysis" says what did it. Similarly, addition of hydrogen to an alkene is also a reduction, and dehydration of an alcohol is also an elimination. A question that asks for "the type of reaction" usually wants the structural word; one that asks you to "classify" may want both.
Oxidation and reduction, [O] and [H]13.2.1(g)
Oxidation numbers work perfectly well in organic chemistry, but they are laborious and rarely asked for. In practice the working definitions are:
- Oxidation — oxygen gained, or hydrogen lost.
- Reduction — hydrogen gained, or oxygen lost.
So the sequence primary alcohol → aldehyde → carboxylic acid is two successive oxidations: the first removes two hydrogens, the second adds an oxygen.
The [O] and [H] convention
Statement 13.2.1(g) gives this in so many words: [O] represents one atom of oxygen from an oxidising agent, and [H] one atom of hydrogen from a reducing agent. It lets you balance the organic change without writing out the full ionic equation for the manganate(VII) or the dichromate.
CH3CH2OH + [O] → CH3CHO + H2O
CH3CHO + [O] → CH3COOH
CH3CHO + 2[H] → CH3CH2OH
These equations must still balance for every atom, [O] and [H] included. Writing "CH3CH2OH + [O] → CH3CHO" without the water loses the mark.
The four mechanisms, and the curly arrow13.2.2
Statement 13.2.2 names four mechanisms. Each is the meeting of a reagent type with a functional group type, and the name is built from the two halves: who attacks, then what happens to the molecule.
| mechanism | who attacks | what the substrate is | where it is examined |
|---|---|---|---|
| free-radical substitution | a radical | an alkane | 14.1 |
| electrophilic addition | an electrophile | an alkene | 14.2 |
| nucleophilic substitution | a nucleophile | a halogenoalkane | 15.1 |
| nucleophilic addition | a nucleophile | an aldehyde or ketone | 17.2 |
What the syllabus says about curly arrows
13.2.2 states it directly: curly arrows to represent movement of electron pairs is expected, and the arrow should begin at a bond or a lone pair of electrons. Three consequences, all of them marked:
• The tail of the arrow goes on a bond or on a lone pair,
never on an atom and never on a positive charge.
• The head of the arrow goes where the pair is going — onto an atom, or into the space where a new
bond will form.
• An arrow moves a pair. A single electron moving in a radical mechanism needs a half-headed
arrow, and drawing a full arrow there is wrong.
Starting the arrow at the positive charge
In the second step of an electrophilic addition, Br− attacks a carbocation. The arrow runs from a lone pair on the bromide ion to the positive carbon — not from the positive carbon to the bromide. Electrons move towards positive charge, so arrows point towards it. Drawing it backwards is the single most common mechanism error and it is penalised every time.
Straight-chained, branched and cyclic13.3.1
The shortest statement in the topic, and worth two minutes. Three words describe the shape of a carbon skeleton:
- Straight-chained — every carbon is joined to at most two others, so the skeleton is one unbranched line. Butane is straight-chained. The name is a convention, not a description: the real molecule is a zig-zag at 109.5°, and it coils freely in solution.
- Branched — at least one carbon is joined to three or four other carbons, so a side chain hangs off the main one. 2-methylbutane is branched.
- Cyclic — the carbons form a closed ring. Cyclohexane is cyclic. A ring costs two hydrogens compared with the open chain, which is why cyclohexane is C6H12 and not C6H14.
The word aliphatic covers all three: it means a compound that is not aromatic, and every molecule on this page is aliphatic. Benzene rings are topic 25.
Why branching is worth noticing early
Branching changes physical properties without changing the molecular formula at all. Pentane boils at 36 °C; 2,2-dimethylpropane, which has exactly the same formula and the same number of electrons, boils at 9.5 °C. A straight chain can lie alongside its neighbour along its whole length; a compact, almost spherical branched molecule touches its neighbours over a much smaller area, so the instantaneous dipole–induced dipole forces between them are weaker. The same fact explains why branched alkanes burn more smoothly in an engine, which is 14.1.4.
sp3, sp2 and sp: shape and bond angle13.3.2
A carbon atom has four outer electrons and makes four bonds. What changes from molecule to molecule is how many of those bonds are σ bonds — and that number, on its own, fixes the shape around that carbon.
The rule, in one line
Count the σ bonds at the carbon. Four means sp3 and tetrahedral, 109.5°. Three means sp2 and trigonal planar, 120°. Two means sp and linear, 180°. A double bond counts as one σ; a triple bond counts as one σ.
| at that carbon | σ bonds | π bonds | hybridisation | shape | angle | example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 single bonds | 4 | 0 | sp3 | tetrahedral | 109.5° | methane, ethane |
| 2 single + 1 double | 3 | 1 | sp2 | trigonal planar | 120° | ethene, propanone |
| 1 single + 1 triple | 2 | 2 | sp | linear | 180° | ethyne, a nitrile |
The reasoning behind the names is that the 2s orbital and some of the 2p orbitals mix to give a new set of equivalent orbitals pointing in the right directions. Mix the 2s with all three 2p orbitals and you get four sp3 orbitals pointing at the corners of a tetrahedron. Mix it with two of them and you get three sp2 orbitals in a plane at 120°, leaving one p orbital untouched. Mix it with one and you get two sp orbitals pointing in opposite directions, leaving two p orbitals untouched. The leftover p orbitals are the ones that make π bonds — which is why the sums always work out.
Hybridisation belongs to an atom, not to a molecule
13.3.2 says "the shape of, and bond angles in, molecules containing sp, sp2 and sp3 hybridised atoms". Propene has all of it at once: the CH3 carbon is sp3 and tetrahedral, while the two carbons of the C=C are sp2 and trigonal planar. A question asking for "the bond angle in propene" is not well posed, and one asking for the H–C–H angle in the CH2 group wants 120°, while the H–C–H angle in the CH3 group wants 109.5°. Always answer about a named carbon.
σ and π bonds13.3.3
The two kinds of covalent bond
A σ bond is formed by orbitals overlapping end-on, along the line joining the two nuclei. The electron density is concentrated between the nuclei, which makes it strong, and it is symmetrical about that line, which means the two ends can rotate freely.
A π bond is formed by two p orbitals overlapping sideways, above and below the line joining the nuclei. The electron density sits away from the internuclear axis, which makes it weaker than a σ bond and more exposed — and rotating one end would pull the two p orbitals out of line and destroy the bond.
Two consequences run through the whole of organic chemistry:
- Every bond contains exactly one σ. A single bond is 1σ. A double bond is 1σ + 1π. A triple bond is 1σ + 2π. So counting σ bonds is just counting the lines in a displayed formula; counting π bonds is counting the extra lines.
- The π electrons are the reactive ones. They stick out above and below the molecule, they are held less tightly, and they are the reason an alkene attracts electrophiles while an alkane attracts nothing. Topic 14.2 is, in a sense, one long consequence of this sentence.
Worked example — σ and π in propene, CH3CH=CH2
Draw it displayed and count the lines: three C–H on the methyl carbon, one C–C, one C–H on the middle carbon, the two lines of the C=C, and two C–H on the end carbon. That is 9 lines.
Every bond gives one σ. There are 8 bonds (the double bond is one bond drawn with two lines), so 8 σ. The one extra line is the π, so 1 π.
Answer: 8 σ and 1 π. The most common wrong answer, 9 σ, comes from counting the second line of the double bond as another σ.
"The π bond is stronger because a double bond is stronger"
A C=C bond (610 kJ mol−1) is stronger than a C–C bond (350), but it is not twice as strong — and the difference, about 260 kJ mol−1, is what the π bond is worth on its own. The π is the weaker of the two components, which is exactly why it is the one that breaks when an alkene reacts, leaving the σ framework intact. An addition reaction to a C=C is the π bond being traded for two new σ bonds, and that trade is why addition reactions are exothermic.
Planar molecules13.3.4
A group of atoms is planar if all of them lie in one flat plane. The syllabus names ethene as the example, and ethene is the clean case: both carbons are sp2, all six atoms are held in the same plane, and the π cloud sits above and below that plane.
The useful skill is deciding which part of a larger molecule is planar. The rule follows directly from the previous two sections: an sp2 carbon and the three atoms bonded to it are coplanar, and so is any second sp2 carbon joined to it by a double bond. An sp3 carbon forces nothing flat, because the single bonds it makes can rotate.
Answering a planarity question
"How many atoms in propene lie in the same plane?" The answer is six, and the working is: both C=C carbons are sp2, so they and everything directly attached to them are coplanar — that is the two doubly-bonded carbons, the two hydrogens on the end carbon, the one hydrogen on the middle carbon, and the carbon of the methyl group. The methyl carbon is itself in the plane; its three hydrogens are not, because that C–C single bond rotates freely. Answering "three, the carbons" is the common miss, and so is answering "nine, all of them". Count the atoms one by one and name them.
The map of isomerism13.4.1–13.4.2
Isomers are compounds with the same molecular formula but a different arrangement of atoms. That is the entry requirement, and everything after it is a question of what is different. The syllabus divides isomerism twice, and the whole of 13.4 fits on one small map.
The two branches
Structural isomerism — same molecular formula, atoms joined in a different order. Divided into chain, positional and functional group isomerism.
Stereoisomerism — same molecular formula and the atoms joined in the same order, but arranged differently in space. Divided into geometrical (cis/trans) and optical isomerism.
Chain, positional and functional group isomerism13.4.1
| type | what differs | example pair | formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| chain | the carbon skeleton — straight against branched | butane and 2-methylpropane | C4H10 |
| positional | where the same group sits on the same skeleton | propan-1-ol and propan-2-ol | C3H8O |
| functional group | the group itself — different homologous series | ethanol and methoxymethane | C2H6O |
The order in which to test a pair is the order the model below uses, because it is the order that cannot go wrong:
- Do they have the same molecular formula? If not, they are not isomers at all, and nothing else matters.
- Do they have the same functional group? If not, it is functional group isomerism.
- Do they have the same carbon skeleton? If not, it is chain isomerism.
- Otherwise the group has simply moved: positional isomerism.
The three functional group isomer pairs worth knowing
CnH2n — alkene and cycloalkane: but-1-ene and cyclobutane.
CnH2nO — aldehyde and ketone: propanal and propanone.
CnH2n+2O — alcohol and ether: ethanol and methoxymethane.
A fourth appears at A Level: CnH2nO2 covers both carboxylic acids and esters — ethanoic acid and methyl methanoate are both C2H4O2.
Cis–trans isomerism13.4.3
Statement 13.4.3 asks for both the description and the explanation, and the explanation is the part worth marks: the origin is restricted rotation due to the presence of the π bond.
Rotation about a C–C single bond is free, because a σ bond is symmetrical about the line joining the nuclei — turning one end changes nothing about the overlap. Rotation about a C=C is not free, because the π bond depends on two p orbitals lying parallel to each other. Turning one end by 90° pulls them out of alignment and destroys the π bond entirely, which costs about 260 kJ mol−1 — far more than the thermal energy available at room temperature. So the two ends are locked, and whatever is on one side stays on that side.
The two conditions — both are needed
1 · Restricted rotation. A C=C supplies it; so does a ring.
2 · Each of the two atoms at the ends of that bond must carry two different groups.
cis — the two named groups are on the same side of the double bond. trans — on opposite sides.
"It has a double bond, so it has cis–trans isomers"
The single most frequent error in this statement. 2-methylpropene, (CH3)2C=CH2, has a perfectly good C=C with perfectly restricted rotation — and no cis–trans isomerism at all, because one of its carbons carries two identical methyl groups. Swap them and you have redrawn the same molecule. Propene fails for the same reason at the other end: its CH2 carbon carries two hydrogens.
Test each end of the double bond separately. Both must pass.
Why the isomers are different compounds, not different views
cis-but-2-ene melts at −139 °C and boils at 4 °C; trans-but-2-ene melts at −106 °C and boils at 1 °C. They are separable, bottleable, distinguishable substances. The cis form has both methyl groups on one side, so the bond dipoles do not quite cancel and it is very slightly polar; the trans form is symmetrical and non-polar, which is why it packs into a crystal more neatly and melts higher. The syllabus does not name this, but it has been examined, and it is the clearest evidence that the two really are different compounds.
Finding cis–trans isomerism, including in rings13.4.5
13.4.5 says "including cyclic compounds", and the reason is that a ring restricts rotation just as a double bond does. The carbons of a ring cannot rotate relative to one another without breaking the ring, so a substituent is locked either above the ring or below it.
1,2-dichlorocyclohexane therefore exists in two forms: cis, with both chlorines on the same face of the ring, and trans, with one on each face. The test is unchanged — each of the two ring carbons carrying the groups must have two different things attached to it, which here means one Cl and one H each.
Worked example — which of these show cis–trans isomerism?
CH3CH=CHCH2CH3 (pent-2-ene). Left carbon: CH3 and H — different. Right carbon: C2H5 and H — different. Yes.
CH2=CHCH2CH3 (but-1-ene). Left carbon: H and H — identical. No.
(CH3)2C=CHCH3 (2-methylbut-2-ene). Left carbon: two methyls — identical. No.
1,3-dimethylcyclobutane. No double bond, but the ring restricts rotation and each substituted carbon carries a CH3 and an H. Yes — the methyls can be on the same face or opposite faces.
E–Z, and why the syllabus does not require it
The cis/trans labels break down when the two doubly-bonded carbons carry four different groups, because then there is no obvious pair to call "the same". The E–Z system fixes this by ranking the groups on each carbon by atomic number and asking whether the two higher-ranked groups are together (Z) or opposite (E). Statement 13.4.2 says E/Z nomenclature "is acceptable but is not required", and every example in this course is a simple one where cis/trans works perfectly well.
Do not translate trans as E automatically. They agree in the simple cases used here, but they are answering different questions, and in molecules with four different groups a trans-looking arrangement can be Z.
Chiral centres and optical isomers13.4.4
Chiral centre
A carbon atom bonded to four different atoms or groups. Such a carbon gives rise to two optical isomers (enantiomers) which are non-superimposable mirror images of each other.
A chiral centre is often marked with an asterisk, C∗.
The word "non-superimposable" is doing the work. Your two hands are mirror images and you cannot lay one on the other palm-down and have the thumbs agree; a tetrahedral carbon with four different groups behaves the same way. Swap any two of the four groups and you have made the other isomer, not the same one turned round.
Enantiomers are almost impossible to tell apart by ordinary means: same melting point, same boiling point, same density, same reactions with ordinary reagents. They differ in exactly one respect that concerns this syllabus — they rotate the plane of plane-polarised light by equal amounts in opposite directions. One is labelled (+) and the other (−). A 50:50 mixture of the two rotates it not at all.
What the syllabus wants, and what it does not
You need: what a chiral centre is, that it gives rise to two enantiomers, that a molecule can contain more than one chiral centre, and the terms enantiomer, (+) and (−).
You do not need: the background theory of plane-polarised light, the R/S system, meso compounds, or the term diastereoisomer. The syllabus says so in the statement itself.
Finding the chiral centres in a structure13.4.5
Work through every carbon in turn and ask two questions. Does it have four single bonds? If it is part of a C=C or a C=O, it has only three σ bonds and cannot be chiral. Then: are the four things attached to it all different?
Compare whole groups, not first atoms
In CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3 the central carbon carries H, OH, CH3 and C2H5. Two of those start with a carbon atom, and a quick glance says "two carbons, so not chiral". They are not the same group: one is a methyl and one is an ethyl. Four different groups, so butan-2-ol is chiral.
The mirror-image error is in propan-2-ol, CH3CH(OH)CH3, where the two carbon groups really are identical. Not chiral. The rule is to follow each branch out as far as it goes before deciding.
Worked example — 2-aminopropanoic acid, CH3CH(NH2)COOH
Three carbons. The COOH carbon has a double bond to oxygen, so only three σ bonds — not chiral. The CH3 carbon carries three identical hydrogens — not chiral.
The middle carbon carries H, NH2, CH3 and COOH. Four single bonds, four different groups: one chiral centre, and therefore two enantiomers. This is alanine, and it is the reason biological molecules come in handed forms.
Two chiral centres would give 22 = 4 optical isomers, three would give 8. The syllabus wants you to know that more than one centre is possible; it does not ask for the names of the relationships between them.
Deducing every isomer of a formula13.4.6
This statement is pure method, and chemguide's description of it — "a nightmare statement" — is honest. There is nothing to learn. The difficulty is entirely in being systematic enough not to miss one and not to draw the same one twice.
The procedure
1 · Work out the degree of unsaturation from the formula. It tells you how many rings and double bonds you have to place, which is the single most useful thing to know before you start drawing.
2 · Chain isomers first. Draw every possible carbon skeleton, longest first, then one carbon shorter with a branch, and so on. Stop when a "new" skeleton turns out to be one you already have, drawn differently.
3 · Then positions. On each skeleton, move the functional group (or the double bond) to every distinct carbon. Distinct is the operative word — the two ends of a symmetrical chain are the same position.
4 · Then other functional groups. If the formula contains oxygen, ask what else that oxygen could be: an alcohol or an ether; an aldehyde or a ketone; an acid or an ester.
5 · Then stereoisomers, if the question asks for them. Check each structure for a C=C with two different groups at both ends, and for a carbon with four different groups.
6 · Check every carbon has four bonds. Then count the hydrogens against the molecular formula. Every structure must match.
Worked example — every isomer of C4H8
Degree of unsaturation = (2 × 4 + 2 − 8) ÷ 2 = 1. So one ring or one double bond, and never both.
With a double bond: a four-carbon chain gives but-1-ene and but-2-ene; a three-carbon chain with a methyl branch gives 2-methylpropene. Three structural isomers.
With a ring: cyclobutane, and methylcyclopropane. Two more.
Five structural isomers. Then stereoisomerism: only but-2-ene passes the two-different-groups test at both ends, so it exists as cis- and trans-but-2-ene. If the question says "including stereoisomers", the answer is six.
Reading the question decides which number is right. "Draw the structural isomers" wants five; "draw all the isomers" wants six.
Self-test13
Thirty questions across the whole topic. Each one explains itself after you answer, and the explanation is the point — a question you got right for the wrong reason is worth reading too.
Definitions to learn13
These are the ones that get asked for word for word. Everything else on this page can be worked out; these cannot.
| term | definition |
|---|---|
| hydrocarbon | a compound made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms only |
| functional group | the atom or group of atoms in a molecule responsible for its characteristic chemical reactions |
| homologous series | a family of compounds with the same functional group and the same general formula, whose successive members differ by CH2, with similar chemical properties and a gradual change in physical properties |
| saturated | containing only single carbon–carbon bonds |
| unsaturated | containing at least one carbon–carbon double or triple bond |
| homolytic fission | breaking a covalent bond so that one electron of the bonding pair goes to each atom, forming two free radicals |
| heterolytic fission | breaking a covalent bond so that both electrons of the bonding pair go to one atom, forming a positive and a negative ion |
| free radical | a species with an unpaired electron |
| initiation | the step in which free radicals are first produced, usually by homolytic fission caused by ultraviolet light |
| propagation | a step in which a radical reacts and a new radical is produced, so the chain continues |
| termination | a step in which two radicals combine, removing radicals and ending the chain |
| nucleophile | a species that donates a lone pair of electrons to form a new covalent bond |
| electrophile | a species that accepts a lone pair of electrons to form a new covalent bond |
| addition | a reaction in which two molecules combine to form a single product |
| substitution | a reaction in which an atom or group in a molecule is replaced by another atom or group |
| elimination | a reaction in which a small molecule is removed from a larger one, forming a double bond |
| hydrolysis | the splitting of a bond in a molecule by water |
| condensation | a reaction in which two molecules join together with the loss of a small molecule such as water |
| σ bond | a bond formed by the end-on overlap of orbitals, with the electron density concentrated along the line joining the nuclei |
| π bond | a bond formed by the sideways overlap of p orbitals, with the electron density above and below the line joining the nuclei |
| planar | having all the named atoms lying in the same flat plane |
| structural isomers | compounds with the same molecular formula but a different structural formula — the atoms are joined in a different order |
| stereoisomers | compounds with the same structural formula but a different arrangement of atoms in space |
| cis–trans isomerism | stereoisomerism arising from restricted rotation about a C=C bond (or a ring) where each of the two atoms carries two different groups |
| chiral centre | a carbon atom bonded to four different atoms or groups |
| enantiomers | the two optical isomers arising from a chiral centre; non-superimposable mirror images that rotate plane-polarised light in equal and opposite directions |
Data used on this page13
These are reference values, not the official data booklet
Bond energies and boiling points differ by a few units between sources. The values below are the ones every model on this page computes from, printed here so you can see what an answer rests on. In an examination, use the data booklet you are given.
Bond energies used in the arguments on this page
| bond | energy / kJ mol−1 | bond | energy / kJ mol−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C–C | 350 | C–H | 410 |
| C=C | 610 | C–O | 360 |
| C=O | 740 | O–H | 460 |
| C–F | 467 | C–Cl | 340 |
| C–Br | 280 | C–I | 240 |
The C=C figure is the one that carries an argument on this page: 610 against 350 for C–C means the second component of the double bond — the π bond — is worth about 260 kJ mol−1, which is both why rotation is restricted and why the π bond, not the σ, is the one that breaks in an addition reaction.
Boiling points of the straight-chain alkanes
| carbons | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b.p. / °C | −162 | −89 | −42 | −0.5 | 36 | 69 | 98 | 126 | 151 | 174 | 196 | 216 |
Relative atomic masses
H 1.0 · C 12.0 · N 14.0 · O 16.0 · F 19.0 · Cl 35.5 · Br 79.9 · I 126.9